Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2087

Introduced
1/19/23  
Refer
1/19/23  
Report Pass
2/13/23  
Engrossed
3/1/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  

Caption

Directing political parties to have procedures for the selection of presidential electors.

Impact

The passage of HB 2087 will directly affect state laws concerning electoral nominations and party organization in Kansas. By codifying the requirement for political parties to have specific procedures for selecting their presidential electors, the bill is expected to reduce ambiguity in the electoral process. This could potentially lead to fewer disputes related to the selection of electors and a clearer pathway for both parties and voters concerning how electors are determined. Overall, this bill aims to align Kansas's election practices with broader democratic principles, enhancing the efficiency of the electoral process.

Summary

House Bill 2087 is an act concerning elections in the state of Kansas, specifically addressing the procedures for the selection of presidential electors. The bill mandates that political parties adopt explicit procedures for selecting their designated electors, thereby reinforcing the accountability and organization within the electoral process. This legislative move aims to standardize the practices surrounding the nomination and certification of presidential electors, ensuring that every recognized political party operates under consistent guidelines. The bill amends several existing statutes and repeals outdated provisions related to the nomination and selection of electors, streamlining the process and potentially enhancing voter trust in the electoral system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2087 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers, particularly with an overwhelming majority voting in favor of its passage. The bill reflects a proactive approach to electoral integrity and could foster increased public confidence in the electoral process. Nonetheless, some dissenting voices may raise concerns about the implications of centralizing procedures too tightly, which could limit flexibility for parties in adapting to their unique operational needs. Overall, the sentiment leans towards a positive reevaluation of how presidential electors are selected in Kansas.

Contention

While there are no major points of contention reported during the discussions around HB 2087, some concerns may arise from political parties with less hierarchical structures or those that find the new requirements restrictive. The emphasis on established procedures could challenge smaller or emerging parties that traditionally operate with more informal or flexible nomination methods. Additionally, the repeal of previous statutes could lead to questions regarding transitional processes and the impact on incumbents. However, these concerns largely did not translate into opposition during the bill’s legislative journey.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB84

Political Reform Act of 1974: political party committee disclosures.

AZ HB2024

Technical correction; ballot; presidential candidates

AZ HB2081

Ballot; presidential candidates; technical correction

AZ HB2101

Technical correction; presidential candidates; ballot

AZ SB1476

Technical correction; ballot; presidential candidates

AZ SB1654

Technical correction; ballot; presidential candidates.

CA SB505

Presidential primary elections.

NJ SCR112

Urges Congress to enact "Presidential Security Resources Reimbursement Act of 2024" to reimburse State and local units for public safety expenses incurred during major presidential and vice presidential candidates' visits.