Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2381

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Refer
2/13/24  
Refer
2/14/24  

Caption

Requiring the court to appoint an attorney to represent a child who is the subject of child in need of care proceedings and allowing for the optional appointment of a guardian ad litem.

Impact

The implementation of HB2381 is poised to have a substantial impact on the state's child welfare system and the way judicial proceedings concerning children are managed. By ensuring that every child in such proceedings has a dedicated attorney, the bill aims to offer a more robust defense and potentially lead to better outcomes for the children involved. It modifies existing statutes related to the Kansas code for care of children and repeals certain outdated sections that do not align with the proposed legal framework. This change reflects a shift towards prioritizing direct legal support for vulnerable populations, thereby enhancing the representation of children's interests in legal matters.

Summary

House Bill 2381, introduced in the Kansas legislature, mandates the court to appoint an attorney to represent any child who is the subject of 'child in need of care' proceedings. This legislative initiative aims to ensure that children have the legal representation necessary to navigate the complexities of the judicial system, promoting their best interests during proceedings that could significantly impact their lives. Additionally, the bill allows for optional appointment of a guardian ad litem, acknowledging that while legal representation is crucial, having an advocate who can address the child's best interests independently can further benefit the child’s welfare.

Contention

As with many legislative initiatives, there may be points of contention regarding the practical implementation of HB2381. Critics may argue about the potential costs associated with appointing attorneys for every child in care proceedings, as this could lead to increased financial burdens on the state or local jurisdictions. There may also be debates on the effectiveness of the appointed attorneys versus existing advocates within the system. The optional nature of the guardian ad litem appointment might also raise concerns regarding the consistency of advocacy across different cases, highlighting a need for standardized approaches to ensure that every child receives comprehensive support during legal proceedings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KS HB2024

Expanding legal surrender of an infant to include newborn safety devices, requiring a referral of an alleged victim of child abuse or neglect for an examination as part of an investigation, creating a program in the department of health and environment to provide training and payment for such examinations, enacting the Representative Gail Finney memorial foster care bill of rights, applying the federal Indian child welfare act to certain actions under the revised Kansas code for care of children.

KS HB2536

Establishing the SOUL family legal permanency option for children 16 years of age or older.

KS SB115

Establishing the office of the child advocate as an independent state agency and prescribing certain powers, duties and functions thereof.

NC H612

Fostering Care in NC Act

KS HB2075

Determining when a law enforcement officer may or shall take a child into custody and requiring that the secretary provide support to such law enforcement officers, the court review involvement in permanency planning and a permanency hearing for a child in custody of the secretary be held within nine months from such child's removal from the and every subsequent hearing 6 months thereafter.

IL HB1596

CHILDREN-PRONOUNS-REFERENCES

KS SB232

House Substitute for Substitute for SB 232 by Committee on Judiciary - Providing for child support orders for unborn children from the date of conception.

KS HB2070

Senate Substitute for HB 2070 by Committee on Judiciary - Establishing the office of the child advocate as an independent state agency, making orders granting custody for adoption subject to the federal Indian child welfare act, directing the secretary for children and families to consider foster parents as prospective adoptive parents in certain circumstances and authorizing appeal of any order of placement of a child.