Kansas House Bill HB2501

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/24
• Refer: 1/12/24
• Report Pass: 2/9/24
• Engrossed: 2/16/24
• Refer: 2/19/24
• Report Pass: 3/13/24
• Enrolled: 4/25/24
• Passed: 4/25/24

Caption

Requiring railroads operating in Kansas to maintain minimum distances from the near-edge of railroad crossings to the storage of certain rolling stock on sidings.

Impact

The enactment of HB2501 will directly affect safety regulations concerning railroad operations. By establishing a clear minimum distance for the storage of rolling stock, the bill aims to minimize risks associated with train operations near crossings, particularly for vehicles and pedestrians. The legislation seeks to enhance public safety by reducing the potential for accidents at crossings, thereby aiming to protect both rail operators and the communities through which the railroads operate.

Summary

House Bill 2501 focuses on the regulation of railroads in Kansas by mandating a minimum distance for the storage of railroad rolling stock near railroad crossings. Specifically, the bill requires that rolling stock not being used for operational purposes must be stored at least 250 feet from the near edge of railroad crossings that lack electronic warning signals. This distance can be adjusted by the Department of Transportation depending on specific circumstances at different locations, allowing for flexibility where necessary.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB2501 appears largely favorable, as there is a recognition of the need for improved safety measures within the railroad industry. Legislators supporting the bill highlight its potential to create safer environments around railroad crossings. However, there could be opposing views from industry stakeholders concerned about operational limitations this may impose, especially if adjustments to the required distances negatively affect logistical operations.

Contention

While the primary goal of HB2501 is to improve safety, there may be contention regarding the specific distances mandated and the implications for railroad operations. Some stakeholders could argue against the rigidity of the 250-foot requirement, suggesting that each location's circumstances should dictate the best practices for rolling stock storage. Additionally, concerns related to the economic impact on railroad logistics and efficiency could arise, as the bill's implementation may require operational adjustments that could lead to increased costs.