Kansas House Bill HB2552

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/24
• Refer: 1/18/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Prohibiting the secretary for children and families from using federal benefits of a child in need of care for the care and custody of the child and requiring the secretary to create and maintain an account of such benefits received for such child.

Impact

The passage of HB2552 is expected to have significant implications on current practices surrounding child welfare funding in the state. By restricting the use of federal benefits, the bill aims to protect the integrity of funds intended for children's additional needs and ensure that they are not absorbed into the system meant to manage their care and custody. This legislative change shifts the responsibility for funding children's needs, advocating for transparency and accountability in the use of federal benefits by the state. Local counties and agencies may need to adapt to these new financial regulations, which may alter funding strategies and caregiving approaches for children in need.

Summary

House Bill 2552 seeks to amend the management of federal benefits received by children in need of care under the jurisdiction of the secretary for children and families. The bill prohibits the secretary from using any federal benefits designated for these children to cover their care and custody expenses. Instead, it mandates the establishment of accounts where such benefits can be allocated for the child's best interests, specifically focusing on unmet needs that exceed the basic care provided by the state. This bill aims to enhance financial accountability and ensure that federal assistance directly supports children's welfare needs, such as educational expenses and personal development.

Contention

Debate surrounding HB2552 may arise primarily from concerns about the practicality of the new regulations. Proponents argue that this bill empowers children by ensuring that their benefits are allocated wisely for their development rather than absorbed in the bureaucratic process of care management. On the other hand, opponents might argue that this could potentially lead to complications in the funding structure, particularly in cases where the separation of costs for care and custody versus unmet needs might create gaps in service provision. The effectiveness of these accounts and the oversight of their management will likely be focal points in discussions as the bill moves through the legislative process.