Kansas House Bill HB2788

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/24
• Refer: 2/9/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Requiring cities and counties to report local economic development incentive program information to the secretary of commerce and providing that such information be posted on the department of commerce economic development incentive program database, requiring certain changes to that database regarding the presentation of search results, providing for a summary report by the secretary of commerce on certain economic development incentive program data and requiring the secretary of administration to include on the Kansas taxpayer transparency act website certain information concerning grants.

Impact

The bill aims to create a comprehensive database that would not only collect this information but also allow for public accessibility. This database would categorize various pieces of data, including the types and amounts of benefits received by businesses and individuals from these incentive programs. Furthermore, requirements for annual updates by cities and counties would establish a system of ongoing accountability regarding their economic development initiatives. Such measures are expected to contribute to informed decision-making at both local and state levels.

Summary

House Bill 2788 seeks to enhance government transparency regarding local economic development incentives. The bill mandates that all cities and counties report details about local economic development programs that qualify for incentives exceeding $50,000. This reporting would be directed to the secretary of commerce, who is tasked with compiling a summary report for legislative review at the beginning of each regular session. The purpose of this provision is to provide a clear overview of state investments in economic development, ensuring a higher level of scrutiny and accountability for the funds allocated to such programs.

Contention

While supporters of HB 2788 argue that it fosters accountability and has the potential to improve the effectiveness of economic development initiatives, there could be concerns from local government officials about the additional burdens of compliance and the bureaucratic processes that could ensue. The necessity for detailed reporting and public disclosure might be perceived as infringing on local governance and autonomy, particularly in how municipalities manage their own economic development strategies. Nonetheless, the push for transparency reflects an increasing demand for governmental accountability regarding expenditure of public funds.