Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB162 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    SESSION OF 2024
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 162
As Amended by Senate Committee on Local 
Government
Brief*
SB 162, as amended, would create the Riley County 
Unincorporated Area Nuisance Abatement Act and the 
Crawford County Unincorporated Area Nuisance Abatement 
Act. The acts would be identical except as to county name. 
The acts would not apply to land, structures, or equipment 
used for agricultural activity or oil and gas exploration and 
development activity.
Determination of Nuisance and Order for Abatement
The bill would require the county to have obtained a 
conviction for a county code violation resulting from the 
nuisance within the prior 12 months before any nuisance 
abatement process could begin. The bill would authorize the 
board of county commissioners (Board) to order the removal 
or abatement of any nuisance within the unincorporated area 
of the county and the demolition of any structure or the 
removal or abatement of any other type of nuisance. The bill 
would require the Board order to require the owner of the 
property to pay all costs associated with the abatement.
The bill would authorize the Board to make the 
determination of nuisance and issue an order, by resolution, 
requiring the nuisance to be removed or abated, if the 
Commission or other agency designated by the Commission 
files a statement in writing with the county clerk describing the 
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
http://www.kslegislature.org nuisance and declaring the nuisance a menace and 
dangerous to the health of county residents.
The bill would direct the Board to order the owner of the 
property to remove and abate the nuisance within not less 
than ten days; the bill would authorize the Board to grant 
extensions of time. The bill would empower the property 
owner to request a hearing before the Board if the request is 
made during the waiting period or any extension.
The bill would authorize the Board to notify the property 
owner of the order by various means, including by certified 
mail, return receipt requested, but would require notice be 
given by telephone or first-class mail if the property is 
unoccupied and the owner is a nonresident. The bill would 
require all orders and notices to be served on the owner of 
record or, if there is more than one owner of record, then on 
at least one of those owners.
Abatement and Payment
If the owner fails to comply with the order, the bill would 
authorize the Board to order the repair or demolition of any 
structure and have the items described in the order removed 
and abated from the property. The bill would require the 
county to notify the owner by certified mail, return receipt 
requested, of the total cost incurred for the abatement or 
removal and to state in the notice that payment of the cost is 
due and payable within 60 days of the mailing of the notice. If 
the payment is not paid within the 60-day period, the bill 
would require the cost to be assessed against the lot or 
parcel of land and the county clerk to certify the costs and 
extend the cost on the tax roll, to be collected by the county 
treasurer.
In determining the cost, the county would be required to 
subtract the value of the property removed or abated and, if 
that value is greater than the cost incurred, pay the owner the 
difference. The bill would authorize the property owner to 
2- 162 request a hearing before the Board prior to the deadline for 
payment of removal or abatement costs.
The bill would make any decision of the Board subject to 
review in accordance with the Kansas Judicial Review Act 
(KSA 77-601 et seq.).
Motor Vehicles
The bill would authorize these counties to remove and 
abate a motor vehicle determined to be a nuisance, except 
when the vehicle is on public property or property that is not 
open to the public. The bill would require disposition of these 
vehicles to comply with procedures for impoundment, notice, 
and public auction in continuing law for vehicles abandoned 
on public highways or other property open to use by the 
public (KSA 8-1102), which include public auction. If a public 
auction is conducted but no responsible bid is received, the 
bill would authorize the county to file proof with the Division of 
Vehicles (Division), Kansas Department of Revenue, and 
require the Division to issue a certificate of title to the vehicle 
to the county.
Any person whose motor vehicle is disposed of under 
these provisions would be eligible for a refund of motor 
vehicle tax, with the amount to be determined as provided in 
continuing law. 
Acts Not Applicable to Agricultural Activity or Oil and 
Gas Exploration and Development Activity
The bill would state the Legislature declares it is the 
policy of Kansas to protect and encourage the production and 
processing of food and other agricultural products, and it is 
the intent of these acts to protect agricultural and 
agribusiness activities from public and private nuisance 
actions.
3- 162 The bill would state the acts would not apply to land, 
structures, machinery and equipment, or motor vehicles used 
for an agricultural activity or an oil or natural gas exploration 
and development activity. “Agricultural activity” would have 
the meaning in continuing law applicable to protection of 
farmland and agricultural activities, and also include real and 
personal property, machinery, equipment, stored grain, and 
agricultural input products owned or maintained by 
commercial grain elevators and agribusiness facilities.
Sunset
The acts would expire on July 1, 2027.
Background
The bill was introduced by the Senate Committee on 
Local Government at the request of a representative of the 
Riley County Board of County Commissioners.
Senate Committee on Local Government
In the Senate Committee hearing on February 14, 2023, 
a representative of the Riley County Board of 
Commissioners, the Riley County Counselor, the Deputy 
Riley County Counselor, and the Crawford County Counselor 
provided proponent testimony. They described nuisance 
properties and the steps taken to try to effect cleanup, and 
discussed a 2012 Kansas Court of Appeals ruling in Barnes 
v. Board of County Commissioners of Cowley County that 
determined a county could not use its home rule powers to 
abate nuisances. 
A representative of the Kansas Association of Counties 
provided written-only proponent testimony. 
No other testimony was provided.
On January 23, 2024, the Senate Committee reviewed 
the bill, received an update from the Riley County Counselor, 
4- 162 and received neutral testimony from a representative of the 
Kansas Grain and Feed Association and the Kansas 
Agribusiness Retailers Association.
On February 8, 2024, the Senate Committee amended 
the bill to:
●Add a statement of legislative intent regarding 
protecting agricultural and agribusiness activities 
from nuisance actions; 
●Add land, structures, machinery and equipment, or 
motor vehicles used for oil and gas exploration and 
development activity to the exemptions; and
●Add the identical (except for county designation) 
Crawford County Unincorporated Area Nuisance 
Abatement Act.
Fiscal Information
In the fiscal note provided by the Division of the Budget 
on the bill as introduced, the Kansas Department of Revenue 
estimates enactment of the bill could result in administrative 
expenditures of $250 to update policies and procedures if the 
nuisance involves a motor vehicle. The Office of Judicial 
Administration stated enactment of the bill could increase the 
number of cases filed in district court because decisions 
made by the Board would be subject to the Kansas Judicial 
Review Act and also could result in collection of docket fees 
for those cases; however, a fiscal effect cannot be 
determined.
Any fiscal effect associated with enactment of the bill is 
not reflected in The FY 2024 Governor’s Budget Report.
The Kansas Association of Counties states the bill could 
have an effect on Riley County due to costs for repair or 
removing the nuisance and a loss to the county if the value of 
the property exceeds removal costs.
5- 162 Nuisance abatement; Riley County; Crawford County; county commission; 
agricultural activity
6- 162