Kansas Senate Bill SB260

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Prohibiting remote ballot boxes, providing for reporting and publication of voting results and public access to voting records and materials, limiting advance voting provisions and requiring receipt of advance voting ballots by election day, limiting the size of precincts, making the general election a state holiday, providing that the sheriff has sole jurisdiction for and shall provide security at voting places, establishing the authority of the legislature over elections with preeminence over rules and regulations of the secretary of state and federal election law and making certain election crimes felonies.

Impact

The bill specifically limits the types of advance voting ballots that can be mailed out, permitting this only for voters who are temporarily or permanently disabled or ill. Additionally, it requires that all applications for advance voting ballots be submitted in writing and be notarized, adding a layer of accessibility for individuals with disabilities. The legislation also seeks to increase election security by ensuring comprehensive oversight of the voting process, with the county sheriff responsible for the security at polling places and specific felonies outlined for election crimes, potentially deterring fraudulent activities.

Summary

Senate Bill 260 addresses various aspects of election procedures in the state of Kansas. The bill prohibits the use of remote ballot boxes, mandates clear and accessible reporting of election-related materials by county election officers, and restricts advance voting provisions. Notably, the legislation ensures that all election-related materials are made publicly accessible prior to election certification, and establishes that the day of the general election will be recognized as a state holiday, encouraging higher voter participation.

Contention

There are significant points of contention surrounding SB 260, particularly regarding the measures that restrict voting access, such as the ban on remote ballot boxes and tightened regulations on advance voting applications. Opponents of the bill argue that these restrictions could disproportionately affect low-income individuals and disabled voters, making it more difficult for them to participate in elections. Supporters, however, contend that these measures are necessary for ensuring the integrity and security of elections, framing the legislation as a means to safeguard the electoral process.