Division of the Budget
Landon State Office Building Phone: (785) 296-2436
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov
Topeka, KS 66612 http://budget.kansas.gov
Adam Proffitt, Director Laura Kelly, Governor
Division of the Budget
May 8, 2023
The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 144-S
Topeka, Kansas 66612
Dear Senator Thompson:
SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for SB 310 by Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs
In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning SB 310 is respectfully
submitted to your committee.
SB 310 would create the Medical Cannabis Regulation Act and would provide for the
regulation of the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale, and use of medical cannabis. The bill
would make related definitions and would include a list of qualifying medical conditions allowing a
patient to use medical cannabis as detailed in the bill. Various provisions of the Act would include
sunsets to expire specific sections if not renewed by the Legislature. The bill would establish the
Medical Cannabis Regulation Program, which would include different areas to be administered by
various agencies in accordance with provisions of the Act. The bill would also create the 15-person
Medical Cannabis Advisory Committee to develop recommendations on the Program and
implementation and enforcement of the Act. The bill would allow for the petition to the Advisory
Committee to request that a disease or condition be added as a qualifying medical condition for the
purposes of the Act, and the bill would include requirements for the petition and consideration of the
petition. Prior to July 1, 2027, and every three years thereafter, the Committee would be required to
review all diseases or conditions to determine if removal of any disease or condition is appropriate.
The bill would rename the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control within the Department of
Revenue the Division of Alcohol and Cannabis Control. The Division would be under the direction
of the Director of Alcohol and Cannabis Control. All duties, powers, and actions of the prior Division
and Director would transfer to the newly created Division and Director and would be in effect until
revised, amended, revoked, or nullified pursuant to law.
The bill would include provisions related to the acceptance of gifts, gratuities, emolument, or
employment for certain individuals, would allow affected agencies to adopt rules and regulations on
the acceptance of official hospitality, and would provide for violations of the provisions. The bill
would require actions taken by the Board of Healing Arts, the State Board of Pharmacy, the Secretary
of Health and Environment, or the Director under the Act be in accordance with the Kansas
Administrative Procedure Act and reviewable in accordance with the Kansas Judicial Review Act. The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Page 2—SB 310
Patients or caregivers seeking to use or administer medical cannabis would be required to
apply to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) for registration. The treating
physician would submit the application on behalf of the patient or caregiver in such form and manner
as prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Environment. The bill would outline the process and
requirements for the application for registration and issuance of the identification card and would
detail the authorized use of medical cannabis, administration by caregivers and the purchase and
possession for both registered patients and caregivers. The fee for registration or renewal would be
set by rules and regulations set by the Secretary in an amount not to exceed $50 for a patient
registration; $25 for a patient registration if the patient is indigent or is a veteran; and $25 for a
caregiver registration. The bill would outline requirements for verification of registration for various
purposes, provide for penalties for violations of the provisions related to registration, and would allow
reciprocity from other states on a limited basis. On or before January 1, 2024, KDHE would be
required to make a website available for public to access information regarding registration under the
Act.
SB 310 would create the Medical Cannabis Registration Fund to be administered by the
Secretary of Health and Environment. All fees and fines collected by the Secretary pursuant to the
Act would be credited to the fund and be used for costs related to the regulation and enforcement of
the possession and use of medical cannabis by the Secretary. On or before January 1, 2024, after
consultation with the Advisory Committee, the Secretary would be required to adopt rules and
regulations to administer the Medical Cannabis Regulation Program and implement and enforce the
provisions of the Act. The bill would outline items to be included in those rules and regulations.
A physician seeking to recommend treatment with medical cannabis would be required to
apply to the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts for a certificate authorizing the physician to do so.
The Board would prescribe the form and manner for the application and the bill would outline the
requirements for the application and certificate. The annual fee for such certificate could not exceed
$175. On or before September 1, 2024, the Board would be required to adopt rules and regulations
related to the certificate and the bill would detail items to be include in the rules and regulations.
Any person seeking to cultivate, conduct laboratory testing of, process, distribute, or sell at
retail medical cannabis, concentrate, or other products would be required to submit an application for
the appropriate license to the Director. The Director would prescribe the form and manner for the
application and a separate application would be required for each location to be operated by the
licensee. The types of licenses would include cultivator license, laboratory license, processor license,
distributor license, and retail dispensary license. The bill would include requirements related to the
application and licensure, as well as requirements for each of the licensees and employees of licensees
to adhere to once a license was obtained. This would include requirements and limitations related to
advertisements and location of licensed premises, security requirements for licensed premises, as well
as the process and penalties for violations of the Act.
SB 310 would only allow for specific forms of medical cannabis as listed in the Act to be
dispensed, although a petition could be submitted to the Director for additional forms of methods to
be approved as detailed in the Act. The maximum allowed fees for the initial or renewal licenses and
applications would be as follows: $2,500 for a cultivator license application and between $5,000 and
$50,000 dependent on the size of the canopy for a cultivator license; $2,500 for a processor license
application and between $2,500 and $20,000 dependent on the total pounds of biomass, or production The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Page 3—SB 310
or use of liters of cannabis concentrate for a processor license; $2,500 for a distributor license
application; $20,000 for a distributor license; $2,500 for a retail dispensary license application and an
amount equal to 10.0 percent of the aggregate amount of retail sales tax levied on sales of medical
cannabis for a retail dispensary license (not to be less than $2,500 or more than $10,000); $2,500 for
a laboratory license application and $20,000 for a laboratory license; and $50 for an employee license.
The fees would be non-refundable. The bill would establish the Medical Cannabis Business
Regulation Fund to be administered by the Director. Collections from licensure fees and fines for
violations would be credited to the fund to be used for costs related to the regulation and enforcement
of the cultivation, testing, distributing, possession, processing, and sale of medical cannabis by the
Division of Alcohol and Cannabis Control. The Director would be required to propose rules and
regulations as detailed in the bill to administer the Medical Cannabis Regulation Program and
implement and enforce provisions of the Act. The Secretary of Revenue would be required to adopt
such rules after consulting with the Advisory Committee. The Director would also be required to
establish and maintain an electronic database as detailed in the Act to monitor medical cannabis from
its seed source through cultivation, testing, processing, distribution, and dispensing.
The Kansas Board of Pharmacy would be required to adopt rules and regulations on or before
January 1, 2024, to establish the requirements for the registration of consultants, including the fee for
such registration or renewal. Any pharmacist seeking to operate as a pharmacist consultant for a retail
dispensary would be required to register with the Board in accordance with rules and regulations
adopted by the board and as outlined in the bill. The bill would also include requirements related to
registration and requirements of registered pharmacists and there would be a maximum allowed fee
of $100 for the registration. The bill would establish the Retail Dispensary Consultant Registration
Fee Fund to be administered by the Board and the collection of the registration fees would be credited
to the fund to be used for costs related to the regulation and registration of consultants by the Board.
The bill would provide an exemption from criminal law of the state for financial institutions
providing financial services to any cultivator, laboratory, processor, distributor, or retail dispensary
in compliance with the Act and all applicable tax laws. The bill would also detail what information
the Director would be required to be shared with financial institutions. The bill would specify that
nothing in the Act would authorize the Director to oversee or limit research conducted at a
postsecondary educational institution, academic medical center, or private research and development
organization that is related to cannabis and approved by the federal government. The bill would also
make clarifications and limitations of the Act in relation to employers, property owners, and
government assistance. The bill would allow intergovernmental agreements with certain Native
American Tribes to provide for a free market exchange between entities engaged in the business of
medical cannabis licensed by tribal government and those licensed under the Act.
SB 310 would specify that it would be unlawful to store or otherwise leave medical cannabis
or a medical cannabis product where it is readily accessible to a child under 18 years of age. The
transport of medical cannabis or medical cannabis products would only be allowed as specified in the
bill. Exceptions, definitions, and penalties for violation of these provisions would be detailed in the
bill. The bill would prohibit law enforcement officers from enforcing federal law provisions if the
substance involved in a violation was medical cannabis and possession was authorized by the Act.
The bill would amend current statutes to protect patients using medical cannabis consistent with the
Act in a variety of settings, including housing practices, certain rental agreements, anatomical gifts The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Page 4—SB 310
or organ transplants, child welfare cases, and certain types of licensures and professional actions. In
addition, the bill would amend various statutes to be consistent with provisions of the Act.
The bill would set taxes on retail dispensaries for the sale of medical cannabis at the rate of
10.0 percent on the gross receipts. The total remittance would be split with 20.0 percent credited to
the Local Medical Cannabis Enforcement Fund; 10.0 percent to the State Medical Cannabis
Enforcement Fund with a limit of $2.5 million per fiscal year; and the remaining amount to the State
General Fund. The bill would establish the two new funds for the tax collections, as well as the Local
Medical Cannabis Enforcement Refund Fund and would detail qualifications and use of the new
funds.
Several agencies were unable to estimate a total fiscal effect for the enactment of SB 310.
From the estimates available, additional expenditures related to passage of the bill are estimated to be
at least $11.6 million, including $10.0 million from the State General Fund for FY 2024. Revenue
generated from the bill is not anticipated until FY 2025. The estimates for each affected agency are
described below.
According to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, enactment of SB 310 would
increase expenditures by $2.5 million, all from the State General Fund, in FY 2024 and would require
an additional 18.00 FTE positions. The agency estimates $1.5 million for their share of a cloud-based
system that would interface with all other agencies necessary to implement provisions of the bill;
$302,893 for administrative costs such as background checks for employees, costs for the Advisory
Committee, and general overhead related to the new program; and $744,951 for salaries and wages
for 18.00 FTE additional positions to fully staff the program as required by the bill. The agency
estimates the need for staff would slightly increase as the program continues, with a total of 20.50
FTE positions in FY 2025. The cost for the computer system would continue but would decrease
after start-up. While some revenue would start to be seen in FY 2025, it would take some time for
the funding to build up. Based on other states’ experience, the agency estimates the revenue would
cover costs by FY 2027.
The Kansas Department of Revenue estimates passage of the bill would require additional
expenditures of $7.5 million in FY 2024. While the bill would eventually generate enough revenue
to cover costs, the revenue would not be seen until FY 2025 and a State General Fund appropriation
would likely be necessary for the first year of implementation. The agency estimates an additional
34.00 FTE positions would be needed to fully implement the provisions of SB 310, with a majority
in the newly established work unit, but notes the positions would be phased in as the program gets
established. The agency would be required to set up the new work unit for licensure and to meet other
requirements within the bill, including the expansion of enforcement agents for regulation. The
agency estimates that of the total, $3.0 million would be for the initial cost of the seed to sale tracking
system, and $2.0 million would be the initial cost for the licensing, enforcement, and legal system
that would be required. The agency anticipates after the initial start-up costs, approximately $3.6
million would be needed annually. Assuming the maximum fees allowed, the agency estimates
revenue from licensure fees to be $1.6 million in FY 2025, $2.9 million in FY 2026, FY 2027, and
FY 2028. The sales tax revenue is estimated to be $730,000 in FY 2025, $2.9 million in FY 2026,
and $5.9 million in FY 2027. Of the sales tax totals, 82.0 percent would be deposited in the State
General Fund and 18.0 percent would go to the State Highway Fund.
The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Page 5—SB 310
The Kansas Highway Patrol estimates the passage of SB 310 would require additional fee
fund expenditures of $875,100 beginning in FY 2024. The agency estimates $120,000 for Troop S,
Special Response Team to retrain eight canines but notes there is a high probability the canines would
need to be replaced as retraining has not been successful in other states. The agency believes the need
for Drug Recognition Experts would be doubled to 180 in the Breath Alcohol Unit if the bill were
passed. The cost for certification of the additional experts is estimated at $600,000 and the agency
notes the process would take approximately two years. The bill would also require additional training
in the Breath Alcohol Unit in Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement. While some
officers have obtained this training, the agency estimates 3,000 of the approximately 6,900 sworn law
enforcement officers in Kansas would need the training. The estimated cost for the training would
be $155,100, and does not include costs for any salaries, overtime accrued, time to prepare materials
for the classes, or additional instructors due to the class volume. The agency notes several items
within General Operations and Field Troops, as well as Troops N and I where a fiscal effect could
not be estimated, including the potential loss of federal funding due to non-compliance with rules and
regulations, delayed or loss of resources, additional specialized training, extended investigations and
additional functions, IT supported tracking systems, impact on personnel if they were prescribed
medical cannabis, and the potential for an increase in calls for service and collisions.
According to the Kansas Board of Pharmacy, passage of the bill would require an additional
0.50 FTE position and would increase fee fund expenditures by at least $42,750 in FY 2024.
Additional costs to the Board would be in the form of staff time and resources for registering and
regulating consultants. While the Board has current processes and staff to support these functions,
each added element of licensing and registration takes additional staff time and the Board states this
would require additional resources. The Board anticipates total associated staff time could
accumulate to 0.50 FTE per year to accommodate these responsibilities, this would include salaries
and wages, plus the cost of administrative overhead. In addition, the Board would incur costs
associated with publication of regulations, notices of hearing, and adoption in the Kansas Register,
published by the Kansas Secretary of State, which range from $500-$1,500 per publication depending
on the length of the regulation(s). The bill authorizes the Board to charge a fee for retail dispensary
consultants and sets up a requisite fee fund, that amount is capped at $100 per annual registration.
The bill includes regulatory oversight of consultants, which includes both pharmacists and mid-level
practitioners in the definition. The Board does not regulate mid-level practitioners and it is unclear
how the Board would monitor compliance for this subset of individuals. A total fiscal effect could
not be estimated.
The Kansas Board of Healing Arts estimates that enactment of SB 310 would require fee fund
expenditures of $246,796 and 3.00 additional FTE positions. The agency states the bill would
increase the workload, including the promulgation of multiple rules and regulations related to a
variety of topics. The agency would need to coordinate with the Kansas Department of Health and
Environment and the Kansas Department of Revenue to ensure a physician applying for a medical
marijuana certificate has no interest in a facility licensed by either agency. The agency would also
need to be prepared to accept, review, and process reports received by physicians with a certificate
outlining their opinions of the effectiveness of medical marijuana. In order to issue the certificates
with the physician’s annual renewals as stipulated in the bill, the agency will be required to undergo
significant system re-tooling and programming. The agency can reasonably assume the creation of a
new certificate would generate an increase in complaints received, investigations of alleged
violations, and enforcement in litigation prosecuted by the agency. Estimated expenditures are The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Page 6—SB 310
$64,741 for salaries and wages for one paralegal in the General Counsel Department; $53,980 for
salaries and wages for one Licensing Analyst in the Licensing Department; $103,475 for salaries and
wages for one Assistant General Counsel in the General Counsel Department; and $24,600 for start-
up costs for all three positions including office furniture, phone lines, computer equipment, and
needed software. The agency notes there may be other expenditures required that cannot be reliably
calculated at this time. The bill would allow for the agency to collect a set amount for initial and
renewal applications. The agency was unable to estimate the exact amount of revenue the bill would
generate. The agency would need to hire staff and begin working on the requirements upon passage
of the bill, but it is likely that the revenue stream would not be seen for several years, however, the
agency does anticipate that in the future, the revenues may offset the expenditures. The agency
anticipates handling any additional workload within existing resources until revenue covers
expenditures but notes the strain this would have on the agency’s fee fund balance.
The Office of the Attorney General estimates total fee fund expenditures of $258,770 and 2.00
additional FTE positions beginning in FY 2024. The bill would require the Office to appoint two
assistance attorneys general to serve in the Division of Alcohol and Cannabis Control. The total for
each position is estimated at $129,385 for salaries and benefits with a $95,000 base salary. The
Kansas Human Rights Commission notes that SB 310 would amend housing portions of the Kansas
Act Against Discrimination. This would result in an increase in complaints and investigations. The
amendments would also require updates to the agency database, posters, and other communications.
The agency estimates increased expenditures of $73,503, all from the State General Fund in FY 2024
and beyond to cover the updates to the database and communications, as well as the salary and
overhead for 1.00 Special Investigator FTE position (currently vacant) to handle the additional
workload. The Kansas Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training estimates passage of
the bill would require $75,000 in fee fund expenditures, in FY 2024 and beyond, for salary and
benefits to add 1.00 FTE position for the purpose of tracking training and qualifications of new law
enforcement officers under the Director of Alcohol and Cannabis Control. The new position would
also provide investigative assistance to ensure that licensed peace officers are not in violation of any
of the bill’s provisions.
The State Treasurer’s Office reports the agency would account for receipts and disbursements
in connection with the bill using existing systems and procedures, with minor modifications. Any
additional workload would be handled within existing resources. The Office of Judicial
Administration states that passage of the bill could affect expenditures as some actions are
decriminalized, which could result in fewer criminal cases being filed or provisions of the bill asserted
as a defense. The bill would also create new crimes that carry misdemeanor penalties which could
lead to more supervision of offenders required to be performed by Court Services Officers. There
could also be a fiscal effect on revenues to the Judicial Branch and the State General Fund. The
Office could not provide an estimate for the total fiscal effect. The Kansas Bureau of Investigation
was unable to estimate a full fiscal effect for SB 310 but notes that the bill would affect laboratory
operations and would require an integration to the Kansas Criminal Justice Information System from
the Kansas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. There would be additional revenue received for
criminal history record checks to offset expenditures related to passage of the bill, however the total
revenue could not be estimated.
According to the Kansas Department of Agriculture, the Kansas Department of Corrections,
and the Secretary of State, enactment of the bill would not result in a fiscal effect on the operations The Honorable Mike Thompson, Chairperson
Page 7—SB 310
of any of the respective agencies. Any fiscal effect associated with SB 310 is not reflected in The FY
2024 Governor’s Budget Report.
The Kansas Association of Counties reports that enactment of SB 310 could have a fiscal
effect on counties that choose to allow for medical cannabis dispensaries in their localities. The local
receipts could offset the local cost of regulation, but the total fiscal effect could not be estimated. The
League of Kansas Municipalities states passage of the bill could have a fiscal effect on cities as law
enforcement agencies would experience increased costs associated with enforcement of the act and
training made necessary by the change in law. As employers, cities could also experience increased
costs associated with educating human resource officials in the city on the effects of the Act on
employment decisions. Some costs to cities could be offset due to collection of taxes, but the total
fiscal effect could not be estimated.
Sincerely,
Adam Proffitt
Director of the Budget
cc: Vicki Jacobsen, Judiciary
Sherry Macke, Highway Patrol
Amy Penrod, Department of Health & Environment
Alexandra Blasi, Board of Pharmacy
Lynn Robinson, Department of Revenue
Kellen Liebsch, Department of Agriculture
John Hedges, Office of the State Treasurer
Sandy Tompkins, Office of the Secretary of State
John Milburn, Office of the Attorney General
Paul Weisgerber, Kansas Bureau of Investigation
Randy Bowman, Department of Corrections
Doug Schroeder, Peace Officers Standards & Training
Ruth Glover, Human Rights Commission
Wendi Stark, League of Kansas Municipalities
Jay Hall, Kansas Association of Counties
Scott Schultz, Sentencing Commission