Kansas Senate Bill SB347

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/24
• Refer: 1/17/24
• Report Pass: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 2/19/24
• Refer: 2/19/24
• Report Pass: 3/7/24
• Refer: 3/18/24
• Report Pass: 3/25/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Abolishing the current wildlife and parks; commission; creating a new Kansas wildlife and parks commission; granting appointment authority to multiple state officers; authorizing the commission to elect a chairperson.

Impact

The impact of SB347 includes a more structured approach to governance within the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks. By requiring Senate confirmation for appointees, the bill introduces a layer of democratic oversight that aims to reflect a broader range of perspectives in wildlife management decisions. The commission will maintain the authority to approve or reject proposed regulations and rates associated with licenses and permits, thus streamlining the regulatory framework governing wildlife conservation and recreation activities in the state.

Summary

SB347 proposes significant changes to the management of wildlife and parks in Kansas by abolishing the current commission and creating a new Kansas wildlife and parks commission. This new commission will be composed of seven members appointed by the governor, who must also seek confirmation from the Senate. This provision aims to increase accountability and oversight over the commission's actions, aligning with the state’s constitutional mandates regarding appointments. The bill is designed to ensure that commission members represent a diverse array of interests, including licensed hunters, fishermen, and non-consumptive users of wildlife resources.

Contention

Despite its intentions, SB347 has faced scrutiny and potential contention. Critics may argue that placing more power in the hands of the governor and requiring Senate confirmation could politicize wildlife management, leading to decisions based on political considerations rather than ecological or scientific facts. Moreover, while the bill attempts to ensure representation from various stakeholders, there are concerns about whether it will truly encompass the diversity of opinions and needs from all Kansas residents, particularly from those who engage with wildlife in non-traditional ways.