Kansas Senate Bill SB558

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/1/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Creating the Kansas medical cannabis act to authorize the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale and use of medical cannabis and medical cannabis products and the Kansas cannabidiol regulation act to regulate the testing and retail sale of cannabidiol products.

Impact

The passage of SB558 is poised to significantly alter Kansas state laws regarding cannabis by establishing a legal avenue for medical cannabis use. The bill permits licensed cultivators, processors, and retailers to operate legally under state guidelines, thus creating a regulated market. Furthermore, the act outlines the legal protections for individuals using medical cannabis, ensuring they can access public assistance, participate in educational environments, and not face discrimination in housing or job opportunities due to their cannabis use. This is expected to lead to broader acceptance of medical cannabis in Kansas society.

Summary

Senate Bill 558, known as the Kansas Medical Cannabis Act, aims to regulate the cultivation, processing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, and use of medical cannabis and its products. This bill establishes a framework for the licensing and governance of medical cannabis facilities and sets standards for testing and compliance. The act is not only a regulatory measure but also acknowledges the therapeutic benefits of cannabis and makes provisions for patients needing access to these medical supplies. Importantly, the bill extends protections to cardholders against discrimination in various public and private sectors including housing and employment.

Contention

Not all stakeholders are in favor of SB558; some have raised concerns regarding the balance of regulatory power versus personal liberties. For example, while the bill prohibits discrimination against medical cannabis users, there are restrictions imposed on usage in public spaces and still prohibits consumption on school properties. Additionally, the nuances of regulating which businesses may still refuse service based on cannabis use could lead to legal challenges. The responsibilities assigned to landlords regarding medical cannabis also stoke debate on tenant rights versus property rights.