Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB73 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    SESSION OF 2023
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR 
SENATE BILL NO. 73
As Recommended by House Committee on 
Corrections and Juvenile Justice
Brief*
House Sub. for SB 73 would create and amend law 
regarding the assessment of and provision of services to 
children in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems; 
cumulative detention and overall case length limits and 
probation violation sanctions under the Revised Kansas 
Juvenile Justice Code (Juvenile Code); exchange of 
confidential data within the juvenile justice system; and use of 
funds from the Evidence-based Programs Account of the 
State General Fund.
Memorandum of Understanding (New Section 1)
The bill would require a memorandum of understanding 
(MOU) to be entered into by the Secretary of Corrections and 
the Secretary for Children and Families by October 1, 2023, 
to coordinate administering a risk and needs assessment to 
children identified as exhibiting behavior that could lead to 
offending behaviors during the course of a child in need of 
care (CINC) proceeding. The MOU would include procedures 
for allowing identified children to participate in programs 
funded by the Evidence-based Programs Account. The bill 
would require a copy of the MOU to be provided to the Joint 
Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 
(JCCJJO), House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile 
Justice, and Senate Committee on Judiciary.
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
http://www.kslegislature.org Collaboration Between Agencies (Sections 2 and 3)
The bill would amend the Revised Code for Care of 
Children (CINC Code) and the Juvenile Code to require, if a 
child, juvenile, or juvenile offender is eligible to receive 
services from the Department for Children and Families 
(DCF), the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC), or the 
Judicial Branch, that these agencies collaborate to provide 
such services. The bill would state that nothing in the CINC 
Code provision or in the Juvenile Code would preclude the 
eligible child from accessing services by the listed agencies 
or any other state agency if the child is otherwise eligible for 
services.
In the Juvenile Code, this provision would replace a 
provision requiring collaboration between KDOC and the 
Secretary for Children and Families to furnish services.
Juvenile Code Case Length and Detention Limits 
(Sections 4 and 5)
The bill would amend the overall case length and 
probation length limits for juvenile offenders. The court would 
be able to extend the overall case length limit to allow for 
completion of an evidence-based program if the juvenile’s 
delay is the reason for failure to complete the evidence-based 
program. Such extensions could only be granted 
incrementally.
The bill would also amend the maximum cumulative 
detention limit to 90 days from 45 days. [Note: Under 
continuing law, there is no limit on cumulative detention for 
juvenile offenders adjudicated for a felony which, if committed 
by an adult, would constitute an off-grid felony or a nondrug 
severity level 1 through 4 person felony.]
2- 73 Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Probation Violations 
(Section 6)
The bill would amend the Juvenile Code to allow a judge 
to commit a juvenile, who is on probation, to detention for a 
probation violation and for contempt of court. The detention 
period could not exceed 24 hours for the first violation, 48 
hours for the second violation, and 15 days for the third or 
subsequent violation.
Confidential Data Exchange System (Section 7)
The bill would require KDOC to develop a system or 
contract with an entity by July 1, 2025, to facilitate the 
exchange of confidential information among all parts of the 
juvenile justice system. KDOC would be required to report to 
the JCCJJO, House Committee on Appropriations, Senate 
Committee on Judiciary, Senate Committee on Ways and 
Means, and House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile 
Justice on the progress of the system development by the 
first day of the 2024 Legislative Session.
Amendments to Evidence-Based Programs Account 
(Section 8)
The bill would amend the Evidence-based Programs 
Account to expand allowable expenditures to include 
evidence-based community programs and practices for:
●Juvenile offenders and their families;
●Children who have been administered the risk and 
needs assessment and have been identified as 
needing services pursuant to Section 1 of the bill; 
and
●Grants under provisions described below.
3- 73 The bill would expand those eligible to administer such 
programs and practices to include community mental health 
centers and any other community-based service provider 
offering evidence-based community programs.
The bill would require the Secretary of Corrections to 
develop and implement a grant program with the goal of 
implementing evidence-based community programs 
throughout the state. The Secretary would be required to 
adopt grant requirements and to evaluate grant-funded 
programs to ensure the program is being delivered as 
intended. Any provider of evidence-based community 
programs for juveniles could apply for a grant, and priority 
would be given to any county that demonstrates low 
availability of evidence-based community programs for 
juveniles.
The bill would require expenditures made from the 
Evidence-based Programs Account to be made promptly and 
on a rolling basis to develop and implement evidence-based 
community programs as services are needed throughout the 
state.
Background
The House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile 
Justice recommended a substitute bill incorporating the 
provisions contained in HB 2021, as amended by the House 
Committee.
SB 73, as recommended by the Senate Committee on 
Judiciary, would have amended the elements of the crimes of 
burglary and aggravated burglary. 
[Note: The House Committee placed the contents of SB 
73 as introduced into SB 174, as amended by the House 
Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice.]
4- 73 HB 2021
The bill was introduced by the House Committee on 
Corrections and Juvenile Justice at the request of 
Representative Owens.
House Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice
In the House Committee hearing on January 30, 2023, 
representatives of the Children’s Alliance of Kansas, Kansas 
Association of Court Services Officers, Kansas Community 
Corrections Association, KVC Kansas, and Saint Francis 
Ministries; a Sedgwick County commissioner; and a private 
citizen testified as proponents of the bill. The proponents 
stated the bill would foster greater communication between 
agencies and maximize resources for juveniles and their 
families.
Written-only proponent testimony was provided by 
representatives of the Association of Community Mental 
Health Centers of Kansas; Kansas Association of Chiefs of 
Police, Kansas Peace Officers Association, and Kansas 
Sheriffs Association; and TFI Family Services, Inc., and by a 
private citizen. 
A representative of KDOC and DCF provided written-
only neutral testimony.
Opponent testimony was provided by a representative 
of Kansas Appleseed and by four private citizens. The 
opponents generally stated that studies have proven more 
detention for juveniles is detrimental to their future, and many 
juveniles get held in contempt of court for angering the adults 
involved in the court system.
Written-only opponent testimony was provided by 
representatives of ACLU–Kansas, Destination Innovation, 
Inc., Justice Action Network, Juvenile Law Center, Kansas 
Advisory Group Executive Committee, and The Gault Center.
5- 73 No other testimony was provided.
The House Committee amended the bill to remove 
technical violations from the types of violations for which a 
judge could commit a juvenile to detention for a probation 
violation. Additionally, the Committee amended the bill to 
allow KDOC to contract with another entity for the electronic 
record system, and to require the system to include a 
verification system operated by KDOC to verify authenticity 
and validity of electronic records.
Fiscal Information
According to the fiscal note prepared by the Division of 
Budget on HB 2021, as introduced, KDOC indicates 
enactment of the bill would require additional costs that the 
agency is unable to estimate. Additional expenditures would 
come from training DCF staff to administer risk and needs 
assessments, additional children served by funded grant 
programs, increased sentence lengths resulting in increased 
community corrections caseloads, design and development of 
new information technology systems or additional 
functionality to current systems, and increased administrative 
costs for staffing to manage more grants and grantees. The 
additional expenditures would be paid from the current 
balance of the Evidence-based Programs Fund or a new 
State General Fund appropriation if the Evidence-based 
Programs Fund balance is unavailable.
The DCF indicates enactment of the bill would not 
increase agency expenditures for the risk and needs 
assessment tool since it is available from KDOC. If the use or 
licensing of the risk and needs assessment tool is required, 
then the agency indicates that approximately 600 youth would 
be affected, and the associated costs would be added to the 
foster care program budget as part of the consensus 
caseload budget process. It is estimated that those increases 
could range between $6,000 to $15,000 per family from all 
6- 73 funding sources, including $3,000 to $7,500 from the State 
General Fund.
The Office of Judicial Administration (OJA) indicates 
enactment of the bill could potentially increase expenditures 
due to the increase in workload for court services officers to 
perform risk and needs assessments and any associated 
costs for providing the assessments. The OJA could not 
estimate a fiscal effect.
Any fiscal effect associated with enactment of HB 2021 
is not reflected in The FY 2024 Governor’s Budget Report.
Children in need of care; juvenile offenders; risk and needs assessment; case length; 
detention; evidence-based programs; evidence-based programs account; 
Department of Children and Families; Department of Corrections; Judicial Branch
7- 73