Enacting the supported decision-making agreements act to provide a statutory framework for adults who want decision-making assistance and amending the crime of mistreatment of a dependent adult or an elder person.
The bill aims to reinforce the autonomy of individuals while ensuring that they have the necessary support to navigate significant decisions. The act emphasizes that decision-making assistance should not substitute for personal agency. This legislative effort is particularly relevant for vulnerable populations, such as the elderly or those with disabilities, who may require support without the stigma or loss of independence that often comes with traditional guardianship or conservatorship arrangements. By promoting supported decision-making, the bill may contribute to better health and social outcomes for these groups.
House Bill 2144, titled the Supported Decision-Making Agreements Act, establishes a legal framework for adults to receive assistance in making decisions regarding their personal, healthcare, and financial affairs. This bill allows adults, particularly those who may be experiencing difficulties in decision-making, to enter into supported decision-making agreements with one or more supporters. A supporter can provide guidance and assist in understanding information, conveying the principal's choices to others, and accessing important documentation such as medical records. Importantly, entering into such an agreement does not denote that the adult lacks the capacity to make decisions independently.
While the bill garners support for its intention to empower adults, there are underlying concerns regarding the potential for abuse or undue influence by supporters. Critics worry that without proper checks, some supporters might exploit their positions, especially in situations involving vulnerable adults. Furthermore, the bill amends existing legislation concerning the mistreatment of dependent adults and elderly persons, which could introduce complications regarding the enforcement of protections against coercive support practices. Debates around the bill highlight the balance between enabling autonomy and safeguarding against potential exploitation.