Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB128

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  

Caption

Creating an exception to certain mandatory reporting obligations for licensed social workers when working under the supervision of an attorney and permitting an attorney to require a licensed social worker to keep ethical obligations of attorney-client privilege while working under the supervision of such attorney.

Impact

The legislation proposes amendments to existing laws, particularly regarding how social workers handle information obtained in their professional practice when collaborating with attorneys. By protecting the confidentiality of clients who are in the midst of legal proceedings or who are seeking representation, the bill aims to encourage individuals to seek help without fear of mandatory reporting that could lead to legal repercussions for themselves or their families. This is particularly pertinent in cases concerning vulnerable populations such as children and elderly adults.

Summary

Senate Bill 128 aims to create an exception to certain mandatory reporting obligations specifically for licensed social workers operating under the supervision of attorneys. The bill allows these social workers to maintain client confidentiality in matters relating to attorney-client privilege, thereby facilitating open communication that is often essential in legal contexts. This change seeks to align the practices of social workers more closely with the ethical obligations that attorneys hold towards their clients, especially in sensitive cases involving abuse, neglect, or other legal ramifications.

Contention

Despite its intentions, SB 128 has sparked a debate among stakeholders regarding the balance between protecting client confidentiality and the necessity of reporting suspected cases of abuse or neglect. Critics may argue that creating such an exception could inadvertently hinder proper reporting practices that are designed to protect vulnerable individuals. Advocates for the bill, on the other hand, contend that the measure ensures essential communications remain confidential and that social workers need the freedom to discuss complicated issues without fearing mandatory disclosures that could damage their cases or the trust of their clients.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS SB2771

Youth court; revise timeline for permanency hearings.

CA AB653

Child abuse: mandated reporters: talent agents, managers, and coaches.

MS SB2790

Office Of State Public Defender; authorize representation of youth in delinquency and/or children in need of supervision.

MS HB1388

Office of State Public Defender; authorize to represent youth in delinquency and/or child in need of supervision proceedings.

AZ HB2604

Child and family representation; appropriation

CA SB794

Juveniles: access and use of juvenile case files.

TX SB2120

Relating to the establishment of a family protection representation program within the Texas Indigent Defense Commission.

MA S968

Promoting access to counsel and housing stability in Massachusetts