Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB60 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 01/22/2025

                            Session of 2025
SENATE BILL No. 60
By Committee on Judiciary
1-22
AN ACT concerning civil procedure; relating to habeas corpus; prohibiting 
second and successive motions in certain circumstances; prohibiting 
claims of ineffective counsel; providing appeals to the supreme court as 
a matter of right in claims filed by inmates sentenced to death; 
amending K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 60-1507 and 60-2102 and repealing the 
existing sections.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas:
Section 1. K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 60-1507 is hereby amended to read as 
follows: 60-1507. (a) Motion attacking sentence. A prisoner in custody 
under sentence of a court of general jurisdiction claiming the right to be 
released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the 
constitution or laws of the United States, or the constitution or laws of the 
state of Kansas, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such 
sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by 
law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may, pursuant to the time 
limitations imposed by subsection (f), move the court which imposed the 
sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
(b) Hearing and judgment. Unless the motion and the files and 
records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no 
relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the county 
attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make 
findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. The court may 
entertain and determine such motion without requiring the production of 
the prisoner at the hearing. A motion filed by a prisoner who has been 
sentenced to death shall be expedited. If the court finds that the judgment 
was rendered without jurisdiction, or that the sentence imposed was not 
authorized by law or is otherwise open to collateral attack, or that there has 
been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the 
prisoner as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack, the court 
shall vacate and set the judgment aside and shall discharge the prisoner or 
resentence said such prisoner or grant a new trial or correct the sentence as 
may appear appropriate.
(c) Second and successive motions. (1) The sentencing court shall not 
be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on 
behalf of the same prisoner consider a second or successive motion 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36 SB 60	2
unless:
(A) The claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law that was 
made retroactive by the supreme court or the United States supreme court 
and applies to the prisoner's case; or
(B) the factual basis for the claim could not have been discovered 
previously through the exercise of due diligence, and such facts, if proven 
and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to 
establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional 
error, no reasonable fact finder would have found the prisoner guilty of 
the underlying offense.
(2) A second or successive motion shall not be filed while an appeal 
is pending on a motion previously filed pursuant to this section or during 
the time within which such an appeal may be perfected.
(3) A motion is a second motion if it raises issues that could have 
been raised in a previous motion filed pursuant to this section. A motion is 
successive if it raises issues previously raised in a motion filed pursuant to 
this section.
(d) Appeal. An appeal may be taken to the appellate court as provided 
by law from the order entered on the motion as from a final judgment on 
application for a writ of habeas corpus. If an appeal is taken on a motion 
filed by a prisoner who has been sentenced to death, such appeal shall be 
taken directly to the supreme court.
(e) Exclusiveness of remedy. An application for a writ of habeas 
corpus in on behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by 
motion pursuant to this section, shall not be entertained if it appears that 
the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the court which 
sentenced said such applicant, or that such court has denied said such 
applicant relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is 
inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of said such applicant's 
detention.
(f) Time limitations. (1) Any action under this section must be 
brought within one year of:
(A) The final order of the last appellate court in this state to exercise 
jurisdiction on a direct appeal or the termination of such appellate 
jurisdiction;
(B) the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States 
supreme court or issuance of such court's final order following granting 
such petition; or
(C) when claiming error in a previous action filed pursuant to this 
section, the decision of the district court denying a prior motion under this 
section, the opinion of the last appellate court in this state to exercise 
jurisdiction on such prior motion or the denial of the petition for review on 
such prior motion, whichever is later.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 SB 60	3
(2) The time limitation herein may be extended by the court only to 
prevent a manifest injustice.
(A) For purposes of finding manifest injustice under this section, the 
court's inquiry shall be limited to determining why the prisoner failed to 
file the motion within the one-year time limitation or whether the prisoner 
makes a colorable claim of actual innocence. As used herein, the term 
actual innocence requires the prisoner to show it is more likely than not 
that no reasonable juror would have convicted the prisoner in light of new 
evidence.
(B) If the court makes a manifest-injustice finding, it must state the 
factual and legal basis for such finding in writing with service to the 
parties.
(3) If the court, upon its own inspection of the motions, files and 
records of the case, determines the time limitations under this section have 
been exceeded and that the dismissal of the motion would not equate with 
manifest injustice, the district court must dismiss the motion as untimely 
filed.
(g) The amendments made to subsection (f) by this act shall not bar 
actions under this section that are brought within one year of the effective 
date of this actIneffective counsel. Notwithstanding the provisions of 
K.S.A. 22-4506 and 22-4522, and amendments thereto, the ineffectiveness 
of counsel during a previous action brought by an inmate pursuant to this 
section shall not be a ground for relief in a subsequent action brought 
pursuant to this section unless such claim alleges that the ineffectiveness 
of counsel completely foreclosed the prisoner's ability to appeal or seek 
discretionary review by an appellate court.
Sec. 2. K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 60-2102 is hereby amended to read as 
follows: 60-2102. (a) Appeal to court of appeals as matter of right. Except 
for any order or final decision of a district magistrate judge who is not 
regularly admitted to practice law in Kansas, the appellate jurisdiction of 
the court of appeals may be invoked by appeal as a matter of right from:
(1) An order that discharges, vacates or modifies a provisional 
remedy.
(2) An order that grants, continues, modifies, refuses or dissolves an 
injunction, or an order that grants or refuses relief in the form of 
mandamus, quo warranto or habeas corpus.
(3) An order that appoints a receiver or refuses to wind up a 
receivership or to take steps to accomplish the purposes thereof, such as 
directing sales or other disposal of property, or an order involving the tax 
or revenue laws, the title to real estate, the constitution of this state or the 
constitution, laws or treaties of the United States.
(4) A final decision in any action, except in an action where a direct 
appeal to the supreme court is required by law. In any appeal or cross 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 SB 60	4
appeal from a final decision, any act or ruling from the beginning of the 
proceedings shall be reviewable.
(b) Appeal to supreme court as matter of right. The appellate 
jurisdiction of the supreme court may be invoked by appeal as a matter of 
right from:
(1) A preliminary or final decision in which a statute of this state has 
been held unconstitutional as a violation of Article 6 of the constitution of 
the state of Kansas pursuant to K.S.A. 72-5633, and amendments thereto. 
Any appeal filed pursuant to this subsection (b)(1) shall be filed within 30 
days of the date the preliminary or final decision is filed.
(2) A final decision of the district court in any action challenging the 
constitutionality of or arising out of any provision of the Kansas expanded 
lottery act, any lottery gaming facility management contract or any 
racetrack gaming facility management contract entered into pursuant to the 
Kansas expanded lottery act.
(3) A final decision of the district court in any habeas corpus action 
filed pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, by a prisoner 
who has been sentenced to death.
(c) Other appeals. When a district judge, or a district magistrate 
judge who is regularly admitted to practice law in Kansas, in making in a 
civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, is of the 
opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which 
there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate 
appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of 
the litigation, the judge shall so state in writing in such order. The court of 
appeals may thereupon, in its discretion, permit an appeal to be taken from 
such order, if application is made to it within 14 days after the entry of the 
order under such terms and conditions as the supreme court fixes by rule. 
Application for an appeal pursuant to this subsection shall not stay 
proceedings in the district court unless the judge of the district court or an 
appellate court or a judge thereof so orders.
Sec. 3. K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 60-1507 and 60-2102 are hereby repealed.
Sec. 4. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its 
publication in the statute book.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34