Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB271

Introduced
1/11/22  
Refer
1/11/22  
Refer
1/18/22  
Report Pass
1/19/22  
Engrossed
1/25/22  
Refer
1/25/22  
Refer
1/27/22  
Report Pass
3/8/22  
Enrolled
3/30/22  
Enrolled
3/30/22  
Vetoed
4/6/22  
Refer
4/13/22  
Override
4/13/22  
Refer
4/13/22  
Override
4/13/22  
Enrolled
4/14/22  
Enrolled
4/14/22  
Chaptered
4/14/22  

Caption

AN ACT relating to the Department of Agriculture.

Impact

The proposed amendments to the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) aim to restructure how agritourism is managed within the state, specifically by housing the agritourism program under the Department of Agriculture. This move is expected to streamline efforts in promoting agritourism and providing necessary support for local agricultural fairs. By emphasizing the importance of agritourism, the bill seeks to leverage agricultural resources and promote sustainable practices, which will ultimately enhance economic growth in rural communities.

Summary

House Bill 271 aims to enhance the agritourism sector within Kentucky through the establishment and management of an agritourism program by the Department of Agriculture. This program is designed to promote agritourism to potential visitors, both national and international, and to assist in sustaining the viability and growth of the agritourism industry in the state. Notably, it includes the formation of the Agritourism Advisory Council to oversee and guide the agritourism initiatives, ensuring that they align with Kentucky's agricultural heritage and economic development goals.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 271 has been positive among stakeholders in the agriculture and tourism sectors. Advocates argue that the bill is a crucial step towards increasing visibility and support for agritourism, which has the potential to draw visitors and stimulate local economies. However, there may be challenges regarding fund allocation and effective coordination among multiple state agencies, reflecting a cautious optimism about the bill's successful implementation.

Contention

While supporters praise the bill for its potential benefits, there are concerns regarding the scope of the agritourism program and its administrative framework. Some critics worry that a centralized approach might overlook the unique needs of local communities involved in agritourism. Additionally, discussions about equitable funding for local agricultural fairs have surfaced, highlighting the need for transparency in grant allocation to ensure that resources are available to all interested parties, thus preventing any potential disparities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KY SB101

AN ACT relating to agritourism.

KY SB214

AN ACT relating to agritourism.

WV SB916

Recognizing authority of Agriculture Commissioner to intervene in matters that negatively affect agritourism

UT HB0559

Local Agritourism Ordinance Amendments

OK HB2157

Renewable energy; stating legislative intent; creating the Oklahoma Agrivoltaics Act; emergency.

CA SB1479

California Agritourism Promotion Act: agritourism civil liability.

CA AB2635

California Agritourism Liability Act: agritourism civil liability.

MS SB2264

Agritourism activity; amend provisions pertaining to.