Kentucky House Bill HB446

Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/22
• Refer: 2/2/22

Caption

AN ACT relating to a cost-of-living increase to the retirement benefits for retired state employees, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The implementation of HB 446 would mark the first cost-of-living increase for retirees from the Kentucky Employees Retirement System since the fiscal year 2011-2012. Many retired state employees have been advocating for necessary adjustments to their benefits to keep pace with inflation and the rising cost of living. The bill's emergency declaration underscores the urgency of the situation, reflecting a strong recognition among lawmakers of the pressing financial needs faced by these retirees, many of whom may be living on fixed incomes.

Summary

House Bill 446 aims to provide a cost-of-living increase to the retirement benefits for retired state employees in Kentucky. The bill proposes an appropriation of $162 million from the General Fund for the fiscal year 2022-2023, which would be allocated to the Kentucky Public Pensions Authority. This funding is intended to prefund a one and one-half percent increase in the monthly retirement allowances granted to recipients serving in nonhazardous positions, effective July 1, 2022. Additionally, the bill allocates $12 million for the same percentage increase for recipients serving in hazardous positions, acknowledging the unique service risks those employees undertake.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 446 appears to be largely positive, particularly among retired state employees and advocacy groups focused on pension reform. Proponents view the bill as a much-needed solution to address long-standing gaps in retirement support and to provide retirees with some financial relief. However, there may be concerns regarding the long-term sustainability of funding such increases, especially given the state’s financial obligations and budgeting priorities.

Contention

While the overall sentiment is favorable, the passage of HB 446 may still encounter scrutiny, especially concerning how the appropriations will impact other areas of the state budget. Some lawmakers may question the allocation of funds, seeking to ensure that the increase in retirement benefits does not adversely affect state funding for essential services or lead to future fiscal strain. Discussions may also arise around the equity of providing the same percentage increase to both nonhazardous and hazardous service employees, particularly in how these benefits align with the risks inherent to their positions.