Kentucky House Bill HB659

Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/22
• Refer: 2/28/22
• Refer: 3/7/22
• Report Pass: 3/10/22
• Engrossed: 3/16/22
• Refer: 3/16/22
• Refer: 3/21/22
• Report Pass: 4/14/22
• Refer: 4/14/22
• Enrolled: 4/14/22
• Chaptered: 4/25/22
• Passed: 4/25/22

Caption

AN ACT relating to revenue measures.

Impact

The changes proposed in HB 659 are designed to streamline the process of cigarette tax collection within the state. By mandating payment within 48 hours for wholesalers and setting clear penalties for non-compliance, the bill aims to enhance adherence to tax regulations and ensure that state revenue from cigarette sales is efficiently collected. This shift is anticipated to reduce delays in tax payments and increase revenue consistency for the government.

Summary

House Bill 659 relates to revenue measures and specifically amends existing laws governing the taxation of cigarettes in Kentucky. The bill outlines the responsibilities of licensed wholesalers regarding the payment of taxes on cigarette sales. It establishes a structured framework for the payment processes, including the requirement for wholesalers to purchase tax stamps within a specified timeframe and outline conditions for those who fail to comply, including potential revocation of licenses.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 659 appears to be focused on enhancing state revenue through stricter regulatory measures for cigarette tax compliance. Supporters of the bill argue that it implements necessary changes to reduce tax evasion and strengthen the financial resources of the state. However, there may be concerns about the impact of stricter regulations on small wholesalers and retailers, who might find compliance challenging under the new rules.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between rigorous tax enforcement and the operational burdens placed on small tobacco businesses. Opponents may argue that the provisions could disproportionately affect smaller wholesalers unable to manage the stringent compliance requirements, potentially leading to reduced competition in the market. Furthermore, discussions could arise concerning the implications of additional fees and penalties imposed for non-compliance, which some may view as excessive.