Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

Kentucky Senate Bill SB13

Introduced
1/4/22  
Refer
1/4/22  

Caption

AN ACT relating to wages.

Impact

The provisions of SB13 would have a considerable impact on state wage laws, resolving ambiguities around compensation and establishing a framework for minimum wage increases that align more closely with economic conditions. The bill also ensures that future increases in federal minimum wage can automatically adjust state policies, thus maintaining a threshold that consistently supports worker compensation. This change could potentially uplift many low-wage workers, enhancing their living standards and economic stability.

Summary

SB13, an act relating to wages, proposes significant changes to the minimum wage regulations in the state. The bill sets forth a gradual increase in the minimum wage, starting from ten dollars per hour upon the bill's effective date, and incrementally rising to twelve dollars by July 2026. This structured approach to wage increases aims to provide a clear path for employees to benefit from enhanced compensation while also giving employers time to adjust to the new wage standards. Additionally, the bill specifies minimum wage requirements for both small and large employers, ensuring that all workers enjoy the same level of pay protections under the law.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB13 is mixed, reflecting broader national debates about wage fairness and labor standards. Proponents, including various labor unions and worker advocacy groups, view the bill positively, arguing that it is a necessary step to close the wage gap and address income inequality. Studies indicate that higher wages lead to improved worker productivity and reduced employee turnover, which can benefit businesses as well. In contrast, there are concerns from some business owners who argue that such increases could strain their finances, particularly for small businesses that operate on thin margins.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding SB13 relate to its potential impact on small businesses versus the benefits for workers. Opponents argue that while the intention to create better employee compensation is commendable, the implementation timeline and wage targets could impose unsustainable costs on smaller employers, leading to job losses or reduced hiring. Supporters counter this narrative by emphasizing economic research that suggests that raising the minimum wage does not necessarily lead to job losses but rather contributes to a healthier economy by increasing workers' purchasing power.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.