Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

Kentucky Senate Bill SB347

Introduced
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/7/22  
Report Pass
3/9/22  
Engrossed
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
3/18/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  

Caption

AN ACT relating to electric vehicle infrastructure development and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The implications of SB347 are significant for state law and the broader transportation framework in Kentucky. By setting a structured plan for EV infrastructure, the bill supports the transition to electric vehicles and aligns with national goals of reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable transportation. The requirement for matching funds from local and nonprofit entities, at a lesser rate than private companies, aims to encourage participation in this infrastructure development. This approach seeks to ensure equitable access to EV charging across different sectors of society.

Summary

SB347 is an act focused on the development of electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure within Kentucky. The bill mandates the Transportation Cabinet to create a comprehensive plan detailing how the state will allocate its funds from the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program. This plan is expected to include assessments of future charging infrastructure needs for various public and private entities, as well as considerations for possible locations of charging stations, particularly at highway rest areas. The urgency of the bill is underscored by its declaration of an emergency to ensure prompt implementation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB347 appears to be largely positive among legislators and stakeholders who advocate for sustainable transportation solutions. The bill has received overwhelming approval, evidenced by the voting outcome where it passed with a significant majority in the House. Proponents view this legislation as a critical step toward modernizing Kentucky's transportation infrastructure and supporting the growing adoption of electric vehicles. However, there may be concerns regarding the funding mechanisms and the obligations placed on local governments, which could prompt further discussion and debate as the implementation progresses.

Contention

While SB347 is primarily viewed as a progressive measure for EV infrastructure, there are potential points of contention that could arise, particularly relating to the funding structure and local government roles. Some may argue that the requirement for local governments and nonprofits to provide matching funds could strain their budgets, especially in smaller municipalities. Additionally, organizing the placement of charging stations without federal restrictions might lead to challenges in execution and logistics. These considerations highlight the need for ongoing dialogue to ensure the bill's objectives are met without disproportionately impacting local entities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.