Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB32

Introduced
1/3/23  
Refer
1/3/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Engrossed
2/21/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Enrolled
3/15/23  
Enrolled
3/15/23  
Chaptered
3/22/23  

Caption

AN ACT relating to classified school staff and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The impact of HB 32 is significant as it aims to standardize the qualifications for classified employees in the education sector. By requiring a minimum level of education for new hires, the bill seeks to enhance the overall quality of staff in schools. Local districts are also mandated to provide written contracts with clear terms of employment, outlining procedures for renewal and non-renewal of contracts, which ensures transparency and protection for employees. Additionally, it provides mechanisms for classified employees facing layoffs to have a right to recall, based on seniority, safeguarding long-serving staff in times of budget cuts or enrollment declines.

Summary

House Bill 32 pertains to classified school staff within the Commonwealth of Kentucky, making substantial amendments to the definition and qualifications required for such positions. Notably, the bill requires that all classified employees hired after a specified date possess a high school diploma or equivalent, thereby raising the baseline qualifications of school employees. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of encouraging employees hired before this date to pursue their high school equivalency diplomas, underscoring a commitment to educational upliftment and professional development within the educational workforce.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 32 appears to be supportive, especially among education stakeholders who recognize the need for qualified personnel in schools. There is an acknowledgment that improvements in the qualifications of classified staff will contribute positively to the educational environment. Opposition may arise from concerns regarding the feasibility of requiring existing employees to obtain additional qualifications, particularly for those who may face challenges in meeting these requirements.

Contention

One notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 32 involves the potential implications for existing classified employees who do not meet the new educational requirements. Critics may argue that imposing stricter qualifications could lead to job losses or increased pressure on current employees to achieve credentials. Moreover, questions arise regarding funding and support for employees aiming to achieve their high school equivalency diplomas, as the implementation of such educational standards will require additional resources and training opportunities from school districts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1691

Education finance: Classified School and Community College Employee Summer Assistance Programs.

CA AB621

Classified employees: Classified School Employees Summer Furlough Fund.

CA AB2160

Classified employees: school and community college districts: part-time playground positions.

CA AB670

Classified employees: part-time playground positions.

CA AB289

Classified school employees: merit system: adoption and termination.

CA AB2931

Community colleges: classified employees: merit system: part-time student-tutors.