Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB347

Introduced
2/16/23  

Caption

AN ACT relating to state government.

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB 347 could significantly enhance the accountability of board members by ensuring that meetings are not only regular but also open to public scrutiny. By requiring advance notice for meetings and stipulating record-keeping practices, the bill aims to foster an environment of transparency that may positively impact public trust in state government. This could lead to more informed citizen engagement and oversight of governmental functions.

Summary

House Bill 347 seeks to amend Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 18A.070, which governs the operations of a certain state board. The bill outlines the election process for the chairman and vice chairman of the board, mandates monthly meetings, and ensures that such meetings remain open to public attendance. This legislation reaffirms the commitment to transparency in state governance by stipulating that any attempts to influence board members or restrict their participation in meetings are banned, thus reinforcing ethical standards within state operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 347 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for transparency and governmental ethics. Supporters argue that the changes reinforce necessary checks on the power of state boards and ensure that they function in a manner that is accountable to the public. Such sentiments are often echoed in discussions centered on the importance of open governance and the public's right to be informed about the workings of state entities.

Contention

While the bill as presented does have broad support from transparency advocates, potential areas of contention may arise regarding the practical implementation of its provisions. For example, ensuring compliance with the open meeting requirements may present challenges in terms of logistics and resources. Additionally, the penalties for violations, while not explicitly detailed in this summary, could lead to debates on what constitutes inappropriate influence and how it can be effectively policed within the framework of state operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.