A RESOLUTION expressing concerns regarding the unintended consequences of the current funding methodology of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA).
Impact
If implemented, HR98 could significantly influence horse racing practices in Kentucky and potentially other states. The resolution calls upon the Federal Trade Commission and the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority to reassess the funding strategies under HISA. The aim is to mitigate any undue economic stress that the current funding framework might impose on horsemen and the broader racing industry, thereby ensuring that local industries do not face disproportionate burdens compared to other states.
Summary
House Resolution HR98 expresses concerns regarding the potential unintended consequences of the current funding methodology of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA). The resolution emphasizes the need for uniform treatment among states to ensure the safety and welfare of both horses and jockeys, alongside instilling confidence in the fairness of horse racing competitions. It further advocates for consistent oversight and regulation while promoting national harmonization in the horse racing industry, with a primary aim of enhancing the sport's integrity and reputation in the United States.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HR98 appears to align with a general concern for the wellbeing of participants in the horse racing industry—both humans and animals. The resolution reflects a proactive approach among legislators to address issues that may arise from existing frameworks, aiming for improvements that would benefit the entire community involved in horse racing. Thus, it can be inferred that there is a bipartisan support for creating a more equitable environment for horse racing.
Contention
Notably, HR98 raises points of contention regarding the current funding methodology of HISA. Opponents of the existing system argue that the disparities in treatment between states pose risks not only to the financial viability of local racing industries but also to the safety protocols necessary for protecting participants. The proposed reconsideration of funding approaches highlights the tension between federal oversight and state-level interests, showcasing the ongoing debate over regulatory frameworks in the horse racing sector.
A RESOLUTION expressing concerns regarding the unintended consequences of the current funding methodology of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA).
A RESOLUTION urging Congress to fund the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority through federal appropriation rather than fees charged to individual states and racetracks.
A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that there is a climate emergency which demands a massive-scale mobilization to halt, reverse, and address its consequences and causes.