Kentucky Senate Bill SB21

Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/3/23
• Refer: 1/3/23
• Refer: 1/5/23

Caption

AN ACT relating to traffic control signal monitoring systems and making an appropriation therefor.

Impact

The introduction of SB21 could significantly alter traffic enforcement by enabling automated monitoring of red-light violations. By instituting penalties and establishing civil processes for violation disputes, the bill provides a clear procedure for those penalized by this system. Additionally, the allocation of revenue from these penalties may offer new funding sources for local governments, thereby impacting budget allocations for public safety initiatives.

Summary

SB21 focuses on the regulation of traffic control signal monitoring systems in Kentucky. This legislation establishes a framework allowing law enforcement agencies to implement these monitoring systems to capture images of vehicles violating traffic signals. A civil penalty of fifty dollars is imposed on individuals caught violating traffic signals via these systems, with revenue generated supporting local governments and the state's Administrative Office of the Courts. The bill aims to enhance traffic safety by providing local authorities with additional tools to monitor and mitigate violations at intersections.

Sentiment

Support for SB21 seems to be mixed among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill represents a proactive step toward enhancing public safety on the roads, as it encourages compliance with traffic laws. Conversely, some members of the public and advocacy groups may express concerns regarding the potential for excessive penalties or the implications of increased surveillance, viewing it as a form of government overreach.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB21 relates to the enforcement mechanisms and civil penalties established by the bill. Critics argue that relying on automated systems could lead to unjust penalties, especially if there are discrepancies in reporting or if individuals are wrongly accused based on the evidence captured. Furthermore, the process for contesting citations raises concerns about accessibility and fairness, as individuals may face challenges navigating the legal system to contest their penalties.