Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

Kentucky Senate Bill SB46

Introduced
1/5/23  
Refer
1/5/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Report Pass
2/21/23  
Engrossed
2/28/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Enrolled
3/15/23  
Enrolled
3/15/23  
Chaptered
3/17/23  

Caption

AN ACT relating to the reorganization of the Office of State Veterinarian.

Impact

By standardizing the processes concerning the sale and inspection of poultry, SB46 is expected to bolster the poultry industry in Kentucky. The bill emphasizes a systematic approach to regulating the sale of poultry and related products, ensuring that health standards are met before these products are allowed into the market. This reorganization is anticipated to improve animal health oversight and may lead to better outcomes for public health by reducing the risk of disease transmission through poultry sales.

Summary

Senate Bill 46 relates to the reorganization of the Office of State Veterinarian within the state of Kentucky. This bill amends existing statutes to streamline the operational framework and clarify the functions of various divisions within the Office. Notably, it outlines the responsibilities associated with the regulation and inspection of animal health, as well as the management of permits related to the sale of baby chick and poults. The restructuring aims to enhance the efficiency of veterinary services in the state, particularly in areas concerning poultry health and disease control, such as pullorum disease management and prevention measures.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 46 appears to be supportive among stakeholders in the veterinary and agricultural sectors. Advocates argue it will foster a more effective and coherent regulatory environment, which is essential for maintaining high animal health standards. However, there may be some concerns from smaller poultry sellers about the additional regulations and compliance costs that could arise from the restructuring of the Office of State Veterinarian.

Contention

While most discourse around SB 46 remains positive, some contention points include the balance between regulatory oversight and the potential burden on local poultry businesses. Critics may argue that while the reorganization is essential for animal health protection, it should not unduly complicate or financially strain smaller operators. Additionally, the specifics surrounding permit processes and enforcement measures are crucial considerations that could spark debate on how best to implement the new regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4200

Health occupations: veterinarians; veterinarian-client-patient relationship; require. Amends secs. 16287, 18811 & 18814 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16287 et seq.) & adds sec. 18818.

TX HB3854

Relating to animal disease control by the Texas Animal Health Commission; providing an administrative penalty.

TX SB1996

Relating to animal disease control by the Texas Animal Health Commission; providing an administrative penalty.

AR HB1611

To Amend The Definition Of Animal Fighting With Respect To The Offense Of Unlawful Animal Fighting; And To Create The Offense Of Unlawful Rooster Fighting.

TX HB2439

Relating to the abolishment of the Texas Animal Health Commission and the transfer of its functions to the Department of Agriculture.

KS SB89

Authorizing the animal health commissioner to adopt rules and regulations to administer the poultry disease control act and to establish an annual participation fee for participation in the national poultry improvement plan, a certification fee for persons performing testing and diagnostic services and a testing fee per visit to each location participating in the plan.

CA AB3252

Animal health.

KS HB2608

Authorizing the animal health commissioner to adopt rules and regulations to administer the poultry disease control act and to establish an annual participation fee not to exceed $50 for participation in the national poultry improvement plan, a certification fee not to exceed $50 for persons performing testing and diagnostic services and a testing fee not to exceed $100 per visit to each location participating in the plan.