Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

Kentucky Senate Bill SB57

Introduced
1/6/23  
Refer
1/6/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/3/23  
Refer
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Enrolled
3/15/23  
Enrolled
3/15/23  
Chaptered
3/22/23  

Caption

AN ACT relating to the Cosmetology Licensure Compact.

Impact

The impact of SB57 on state laws is significant as it introduces a multistate licensing model for cosmetologists, which could streamline the credentialing process and ensure that professionals can easily move and practice in different states. States that adopt this compact will need to align their licensing regulations with the standards set forth in the agreement, potentially leading to a reevaluation of existing state regulatory frameworks. Additionally, it includes provisions specifically addressing the needs of active military members and their spouses, thereby reinforcing workforce mobility for this demographic.

Summary

SB57 establishes the Cosmetology Licensure Compact, aimed at facilitating interstate practice for cosmetologists. This compact seeks to create a regulatory framework that allows licensed cosmetologists to practice across state lines without the need for multiple state licenses. The main objectives include enhancing public access to cosmetology services, improving safety standards, and reducing barriers to entry for professionals in the industry. By joining the compact, member states agree to uphold uniform standards for licensure and regulation, thereby creating a pool of licensed professionals who can work in various states without redundant licensing requirements.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB57 appears to be supportive from stakeholders in the cosmetology industry, especially among those advocating for increased mobility and access to services. Supporters believe this legislation will simplify the process for professionals and enhance overall consumer access to qualified services. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential for reduced local regulatory control, as standardization could prevent states from addressing unique local issues related to cosmetology practice and consumer safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the compact's requirement for states to adhere to uniform standards, which could limit the ability of local regulators to enforce specific protections tailored to their communities. Some may argue that the compact's provisions could dilute local regulatory authority over cosmetology practices, which traditionally have been managed at the state level. Additionally, the governance structure established by the compact to oversee its implementation may evoke debates about accountability and the regulatory oversight balance between state and federal interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV HB2941

The purpose of this bill is to establish the Interstate Cosmetology Licensure Compact, create the Interstate Cosmetology Licensure Compact Commission, and provide for the administration of the Compact.

MD HB383

Cosmetology Licensure Compact

MD SB27

Cosmetology Licensure Compact

NV AB371

Enacts the Cosmetology Licensure Compact. (BDR 54-835)

TX SB20

Relating to the Cosmetology Licensure Compact; authorizing fees.

TX SB16

Relating to the Cosmetology Licensure Compact; authorizing fees.

TX SB1615

Relating to the cosmetology licensure compact.

TX HB705

Relating to the Cosmetology Licensure Compact; authorizing fees.