Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB214

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  
Refer
3/1/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/15/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/26/24  
Refer
3/28/24  
Enrolled
4/15/24  
Enrolled
4/15/24  
Chaptered
4/18/24  

Caption

AN ACT relating to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws is significant as it creates a clear and comprehensive framework for the protection of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. By outlining specific rights, HB214 seeks to enhance the well-being of this vulnerable population by ensuring access to necessary resources and opportunities for economic independence. This act sets a precedent within the state's legal system, reinforcing the rights of these individuals to participate fully in society and make choices regarding their lives and care.

Summary

House Bill 214, known as the Frank Huffman Act, specifically addresses the rights of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Kentucky. This legislation aims to safeguard these individuals from discrimination and ensure their dignity is recognized and respected. It defines a range of rights including the right to appropriate living environments, equal treatment under the law, and freedom from various forms of abuse. Importantly, the bill reaffirms these rights in addition to those already established under existing Kentucky laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB214 appears predominantly positive, reflecting a strong bipartisan agreement on the importance of protecting the rights of individuals with disabilities. Supporters of the bill argue that it is a crucial step in ensuring that these individuals have the same rights and opportunities as all citizens. There is a general consensus that enhancing the rights and protections for people with intellectual disabilities is a moral imperative and serves to enrich the community as a whole.

Contention

While the discussions around the bill are largely supportive, some points of contention may arise regarding the enforcement and implementation of these rights. Critics might argue about the adequacy of resources to support the requirements laid out in the bill, as well as the potential for unintended consequences in the application of these rights in various settings. Ensuring compliance among caretakers and service providers could also pose challenges that lawmakers will need to address as the bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.