Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB369

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Refer
2/12/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Engrossed
3/6/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Report Pass
3/13/25  
Refer
3/14/25  
Refer
3/14/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Enrolled
3/27/25  
Enrolled
3/27/25  
Chaptered
3/31/25  

Caption

AN ACT relating to police department members.

Impact

If enacted, HB 369 would amend existing KRS 95.495, impacting the work schedules and compensation structures for police department members. It seeks to provide clarity on working hours and overtime payments, ensuring officers are compensated appropriately for extra hours worked beyond the stipulated limits. The introduction of mandatory annual leave serves to protect the mental and physical well-being of law enforcement personnel. This amendment is particularly relevant for urban-county governments and cities classified as second or third class, which will be required to comply with the new regulations.

Summary

House Bill 369 aims to establish new regulations concerning the working hours and conditions for members of police departments in Kentucky. The bill delineates a maximum work schedule for police officers, stating that they should not be required to work more than eight hours a day for five days or ten hours a day for four. It also allows for up to fifteen days of annual leave for full pay, reflecting efforts to address the work-life balance of law enforcement personnel. This legislative proposal signifies an effort to standardize the working conditions for police officers across urban areas and enhance their welfare.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 369 appears supportive among law enforcement agencies and advocacy groups for police welfare, as it addresses crucial issues of officer well-being and work-life balance. However, there may be contention from other stakeholders concerned about the implications for public safety and operational capacity if police departments face restrictions on work hours. The potential for increased overtime costs could also raise concerns among municipal budget planners, leading to discussions about the sustainability of such provisions in the long term.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely include discussions around the financial implications for cities and counties required to implement these changes. While the intent is to improve officer satisfaction and retention, critics may raise concerns regarding the feasibility of maintaining adequate police presence and responsiveness, particularly in emergencies. Additionally, the question of how these changes might affect overall police productivity and community safety will be critical areas of debate, as any alterations to hours worked can influence law enforcement's ability to respond effectively to incidents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.