Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB498 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

                            UNOFFICIAL COPY  	25 RS BR 1663 
Page 1 of 2 
XXXX   2/12/2025 2:43 PM  	Jacketed 
AN ACT relating to use of artificial intelligence by courts. 1 
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: 2 
SECTION 1.   A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 21A IS CREATED TO 3 
READ AS FOLLOWS: 4 
(1) The General Assembly respectfully requests that the Supreme Court of Kentucky 5 
institute a pilot project to study the feasibility and desirability of the use of 6 
artificial intelligence for transcription services in court proceedings. 7 
(2) (a) The pilot project may be established in a minimum of three (3) diverse 8 
judicial districts or judicial circuits or a division or divisions thereof chosen 9 
by the Chief Justice. 10 
(b) A pilot project authorized by this subsection shall not be established in a 11 
judicial district or judicial circuit or a division thereof when objected to by 12 
the applicable judge. 13 
(3) The pilot project shall: 14 
(a) Require participating courts to use artificial intelligence for transcription 15 
services in court proceedings; 16 
(b) Last for four (4) years, unless extended or limited by the General Assembly; 17 
(c) Be monitored and evaluated by the Administrative Office of the Courts to 18 
determine: 19 
1. Whether there are adverse effects resulting from the use of artificial 20 
intelligence for transcription services in court proceedings; 21 
2. Whether the pilot project demonstrates a benefit to the litigants; 22 
3. Whether the pilot project demonstrates a benefit to the public, with 23 
particular regard to: 24 
a. Whether the program results in a cost savings to the courts; and 25 
b. Whether the program results in improved efficiency in court 26 
operations; 27  UNOFFICIAL COPY  	25 RS BR 1663 
Page 2 of 2 
XXXX   2/12/2025 2:43 PM  	Jacketed 
4. Whether the pilot project supports a determination that artificial 1 
intelligence should be used for transcription services in court 2 
proceedings; 3 
5. The parameters and limits of the program; 4 
6. Suggestions for the operation and improvement of the program; 5 
7. Rules changes which may be needed if the program is to be made 6 
permanent and expanded to all courts; and 7 
8. Recommendations for statutory changes which may be needed if the 8 
program is to be made permanent and expanded to all courts. 9 
(4) The Administrative Office of the Courts: 10 
(a) Shall provide an annual report to the Legislative Research Commission for 11 
referral to the Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary by September 1 of each 12 
year the program is in operation with statistics, findings, and 13 
recommendations; and 14 
(b) May make periodic progress reports and statistical reports and provide 15 
suggestions to the Legislative Research Commission when determined 16 
necessary by the Chief Justice. 17