Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB690

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  

Caption

AN ACT relating to contracts.

Impact

If enacted, HB690 would significantly alter the landscape of labor law in Kentucky by rendering non-compete agreements void with respect to covered employees. The bill allows covered employees to file civil actions against employers who attempt to enforce such agreements, which could lead to increased litigation regarding employment contracts. The bill adds that employers may not retaliate against employees who exercise this right, thereby strengthening protective measures for workers in the state.

Summary

House Bill 690 aims to regulate the use of covenants not to compete in employment contracts within the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Specifically, the bill prohibits employers from entering into, enforcing, or threatening to enforce non-compete agreements with covered employees, defining these as individuals earning less than $2,000 per week. This change is intended to empower lower-wage workers by preventing employers from restricting their employment opportunities post-termination due to enforceable non-compete clauses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB690 appears to be generally supportive among labor advocates and those favoring employee rights, as it seeks to limit the power of employers in restricting the mobility of lower-wage workers. However, there exists concern among some business owners and employer associations who argue that such restrictions could harm their ability to protect legitimate business interests and trade secrets, potentially leading to a competitive disadvantage.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential economic implications for businesses that rely on non-compete agreements to safeguard proprietary information and maintain competitive advantage in the marketplace. Critics of the bill express worry that without the ability to enforce these agreements, companies might face challenges in retaining innovative strategies, which they typically protect through such contracts. Moreover, opponents argue that this too broad of a restriction could result in decreased economic activity in sectors where competition is critical.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.