Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB72

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Engrossed
2/25/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Refer
2/27/25  
Report Pass
3/11/25  
Enrolled
3/28/25  
Enrolled
3/28/25  
Chaptered
3/31/25  

Caption

AN ACT relating to limited X-ray machine operators.

Impact

The implications of HB72 extend into the realm of state healthcare laws, particularly those governing medical imaging and operator qualifications. This legislation not only updates the existing regulations but also seeks to establish a framework that aligns with national standards. By doing so, it aims to mitigate risks associated with improper imaging practices, thereby promoting better health outcomes for patients. The bill's passage would lead to enhanced regulatory oversight of limited X-ray machine operators and could potentially influence employment practices within healthcare facilities.

Summary

House Bill 72 aims to establish new regulations for limited X-ray machine operators in Kentucky, addressing qualifications and operational standards for these healthcare professionals. By defining the roles and responsibilities of limited X-ray machine operators, the bill seeks to enhance the safety and efficacy of medical imaging practices in the state. It mandates that such operators must receive appropriate training and certification from recognized national organizations, ensuring that they possess the necessary skills to perform radiographic procedures safely.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB72 appears to be positive among stakeholders in the medical community. Healthcare professionals and regulatory bodies support the move towards standardization and improved training requirements. However, there may be some concerns regarding the potential for increased operational costs for medical facilities that will need to comply with the new regulations. The general opposition seems to stem from fears that strict regulations might limit the number of individuals qualified to perform these essential tasks, thereby impacting service delivery in some areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent to which the bill defines the scope of practice for limited X-ray machine operators. Critics argue that the bill could inadvertently restrict access to imaging services in underserved regions by imposing rigorous standards that not all operators can meet. Hence, while the bill aims to ensure quality and safety in medical imaging, the discussions highlight the balance between regulatory oversight and accessibility to necessary healthcare services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

TX HB1797

Relating to coverage for certain individuals under certain health benefit plans offered to governmental employees.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

HI HB286

Relating To The Individual Housing Account Program.

DE HB140

An Act To Amend Title 16 Of The Delaware Code Relating To End Of Life Options.

CA AB820

Homelessness: transport.

CA SB257

Pregnancy As a Recognized Event for Nondiscriminatory Treatment (PARENT) Act.

IA HF905

A bill for an act relating to the establishment of the work without worry program under the medical assistance program for employed individuals with disabilities, and including effective date provisions.(Formerly HSB 241.)