Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Kentucky Senate Bill SB133

Introduced
2/11/25  
Refer
2/11/25  
Refer
2/13/25  
Report Pass
3/4/25  
Engrossed
3/6/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Report Pass
3/12/25  
Enrolled
3/14/25  
Enrolled
3/14/25  
Chaptered
3/24/25  

Caption

AN ACT relating to sanctioning bodies for boxing and wrestling exhibitions.

Impact

The implementation of SB 133 will notably affect how sanctioning bodies are recognized and regulated in Kentucky. By mandating that all sanctioning bodies must be nonprofit organizations seeking recognition from the Kentucky Boxing and Wrestling Commission, the bill aims to ensure that all entities involved in organizing combat sports exhibitions adhere to a standardized set of criteria. This change is expected to promote safety and regulatory compliance in combat sports events, while also enhancing the integrity of competitions.

Summary

Senate Bill 133 is legislation aimed at revising and clarifying the regulations surrounding sanctioning bodies for boxing and wrestling exhibitions in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The bill updates the definitions of various combat sports, including boxing, mixed martial arts, and kickboxing, to ensure that they are accurately represented within state law. It emphasizes that USA Boxing is the only recognized sanctioning body for combat sports outside those otherwise covered under existing laws. This bill is intended to streamline oversight and increase regulatory clarity within the realm of combat sports.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding SB 133 appears to be supportive among members of the legislature, particularly from those involved in regulatory oversight and public safety. Advocates believe that clear and precise regulations can enhance the combat sports industry in Kentucky by ensuring that events are sanctioned correctly and that participant safety is prioritized. However, there may also be concerns from independent promoters and smaller organizations that rely on flexibility and less bureaucratic processes, which could be seen as barriers to entry.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 133 include discussions on whether the regulatory framework fully accommodates the diverse nature of combat sports. Some stakeholders may argue that the limitations on recognized sanctioning bodies could stifle growth and innovation in the industry, especially for emerging sports formats. There is also the potential concern regarding how the regulations would impact local events and the accessibility of combat sports opportunities for both participants and fans.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.