Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB1064

Introduced
3/29/10  

Caption

Authorizes the Dept. of Revenue to implement an electronic financial institution information match system for use in collecting state taxes (OR -$305,000 SG EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 1064 would significantly affect the operations of the Department of Revenue and financial institutions in Louisiana. The legislation empowers the Secretary of the Department to require financial institutions to provide data on account holders, including sensitive information such as social security numbers and account balances, pertaining to individuals identified as tax debtors. This might lead to an increase in tax revenue for the state but also raises concerns regarding data privacy and the handling of personal financial information.

Summary

House Bill 1064 establishes an electronic financial institution information match system for the Louisiana Department of Revenue. This system is designed to aid in identifying tax debtors by allowing the Department to compare personal account information from financial institutions with its database of individuals who have unresolved tax obligations. The primary objective is to enhance tax collection efforts and streamline the enforcement of tax laws within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1064 appears to be mixed, reflecting both support and concern. Proponents of the bill argue that better tracking of tax debts through financial institutions will promote fiscal responsibility and compliance among taxpayers, potentially improving state finances. However, there is also notable apprehension regarding the implications for personal privacy, as the bill requires financial institutions to share detailed personal account information. Critics express that this measure could be seen as an overreach of government authority into private financial matters.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the balance between effective tax collection and the protection of individual privacy rights. Stakeholders, including financial institutions and privacy advocates, might contest the burden this bill places on them while questioning the adequacy of safeguards for the sensitive data being shared. Furthermore, discussions may arise about the legal ramifications for financial institutions in terms of liability when disclosing information under this new framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A4970

Requires public institutions of higher education to submit annual fiscal monitoring report; authorizes Secretary of Higher Education to appoint State monitor of certain institutions; requires higher education chief financial officers complete training; annually appropriates $100,000.

NJ S3406

Requires public institutions of higher education to submit annual fiscal monitoring report; authorizes Secretary of Higher Education to appoint State monitor of certain institutions; requires higher education chief financial officers complete training; annually appropriates $100,000.

NJ S3732

Requires degree-granting proprietary institutions to expend at least 70 percent of tuition and fee revenues on educational instruction and student support services.

NJ A4665

Requires Secretary of Higher Education and public institutions of higher education to develop programs for improving Hispanic and Latino representation in higher education leadership positions.

NJ S3642

Requires Secretary of Higher Education and public institutions of higher education to develop programs for improving Hispanic and Latino representation in higher education leadership positions.

NJ A4853

Permits Secretary of Higher Education to appoint antisemitism monitor to any institution of higher education; requires institution to implement recommendations of antisemitism monitor.

NJ S3718

Permits Secretary of Higher Education to appoint antisemitism monitor to any institution of higher education; requires institution to implement recommendations of antisemitism monitor.

NJ S3820

Requires certain institutions of higher education and degree-granting proprietary institutions to submit certain documentation on online program managers to Secretary of Higher Education.