Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB1147

Introduced
3/29/10  

Caption

Prohibits a policyholder from allowing any person excluded from liability coverage to drive the covered vehicle

Impact

The proposed law sets out clear guidelines for policyholders and insurers, emphasizing accountability and transparency in the management of excluded drivers. The Department of Public Safety and Corrections, along with local law enforcement, is granted the authority to investigate violations and issue penalties. This may lead to increased compliance with insurance policies and potentially reduce instances of unlawfully permitting excluded drivers to operate vehicles, thereby enhancing overall road safety and accountability among motorists.

Summary

House Bill 1147 establishes new provisions concerning motor vehicle liability policies, specifically aimed at regulating the exclusion of drivers from coverage. The bill requires that any person excluded from liability coverage must be a party to the written agreement and must sign the driver exclusion form. This is a significant change from previous law, which allowed for exclusions without the excluded person's consent. Furthermore, it mandates that a new exclusion form is required whenever a policy is renewed, reinstated, or amended, ensuring that exclusions remain up-to-date throughout the life of the policy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1147 appears positive among those advocating for stricter insurance regulations, as it aims to mitigate risks associated with excluded drivers and protect both insurers and other road users. However, there may be some contention among policyholders who feel that these requirements impose additional burdens on them, especially those who may not be fully aware of the implications of excluding drivers from coverage.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the potential administrative burden placed on policyholders to maintain accurate records regarding excluded drivers and the necessity for enforcing compliance through penalties. Some critics argue that the bill could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased insurance costs if insurance providers choose to raise premiums or cancel policies for violations. Nonetheless, supporters argue that these measures are necessary to protect all motorists and improve the integrity of automobile insurance policies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MT HB182

Revise Montana voluntary insurance telematics laws

TX HB597

Relating to an appraisal procedure for disputed losses under certain property and casualty insurance policies.

HI SB2259

Relating To Health.

HI HB2157

Relating To Employer Health Care Requirements.

CT SB00090

An Act Establishing A Loan Program For The Removal Of Hazardous Trees From Private Property.

IL HB3754

INS CD-OUTSTANDING BALANCE

TX HB4194

Relating to an appraisal process for disputed losses under personal automobile or residential property insurance policies.

HI SB1172

Relating To Employer Health Care Requirements.