Louisiana House Bill HB1172

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/12/10
• Engrossed: 5/24/10
• Refer: 5/25/10
• Report Pass: 6/9/10
• Enrolled: 6/21/10
• Vetoed: 7/2/10

Caption

Provides relative to the allocation and use of space within the state capitol complex

Impact

The passage of HB 1172 would significantly adjust how space within the state capitol is designated and used, particularly impacting the executive branch's spatial arrangements. As stipulated in the bill, designated areas would include specific floors in the capitol for different state officers and agencies. The intended outcome is to enhance the efficiency and functionality of the state government within their operational confines, although it could also lead to potential tensions regarding control over these spaces.

Summary

House Bill 1172 primarily addresses the allocation and use of space within the Louisiana State Capitol and its associated buildings. The bill redefines spaces assigned to various state officials, including the governor, attorney general, and treasurer, while also stipulating the use of additional buildings in the capitol complex. These changes aim to organize the operational areas of state governance and establish clearer definitions of space as it pertains to government personnel and their functions.

Sentiment

The sentiments around HB 1172 appear mixed. Proponents argue that the changes are necessary for better organization and management of the capitol complex's space, enabling more effective governance. However, there were also critical perspectives, especially from the executive branch, which voiced concerns about the bill's implications for the governor's ability to manage office space effectively. This friction highlights ongoing deliberations about the balance of power between different branches of state government.

Contention

Notably, the bill faced veto from the governor, primarily due to concerns about overly restricting executive input in the space allocation process within the State Capitol. The veto indicated a fundamental disagreement regarding the balance of authority, which could impede inter-branch cooperation in managing legislative and executive spaces within this iconic government building. The veto message emphasized the need for a more collaborative approach rather than a purely dictated allocation.