Creates the crime of tampering with surveillance, accounting, inventory, or monitoring systems (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The impact of HB 123 is significant as it establishes clear legal repercussions for individuals who interfere with essential monitoring systems. For general violations, the penalties include fines up to $1,000 and imprisonment for up to one year. Importantly, if the offense occurs within the confines of correctional facilities, the penalties are heightened, with fines reaching $2,000 and potential imprisonment for two years. This adjustment reflects a legislative intent to enhance security measures in settings where monitoring systems are crucial for safety and operational integrity.
Summary
House Bill 123 introduces a new offense related to the tampering of surveillance, accounting, inventory, or monitoring systems. This legislation aims to define and penalize actions that intentionally disrupt or damage these systems by prohibiting a range of activities, such as disconnecting signals or obstructing operation. The bill comprehensively describes the various types of systems affected, which include electronic, analog, and digital technologies that monitor or record data across several parameters.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive, particularly from law enforcement and security advocates who believe that the new law is necessary to deter criminal activities targeting surveillance systems. However, there are concerns regarding the potential for overly broad application of the law that might unintentionally criminalize legitimate activities related to technology maintenance or security assessments.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise from the bill's definitions and scope, particularly around the interpretation of what constitutes tampering. Critics could argue that the bill may impose severe penalties for minor infractions or misinterpretations of actions typically conducted in maintenance or repair of monitoring systems. Therefore, while the intention is to protect critical systems from malicious activities, stakeholders may demand clarity to avoid legal ambiguity.
Creates a uniform system of gradations for types of theft and certain other crimes providing for misappropriation without violence (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)