Louisiana House Bill HB222

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/12/10
• Engrossed: 5/13/10
• Refer: 5/17/10
• Report Pass: 5/25/10
• Enrolled: 6/9/10
• Chaptered: 6/21/10
• Passed: 6/21/10

Caption

Provides for the garnishment of income for child support (EN FF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB222 would revise the statutes under R.S. 46:236.3(E)(3) regarding the garnishment of wages for child support obligations. This law facilitates the streamlined forwarding of income deductions, requiring that funds be sent to the designated recipients within seven days of being withheld. By clarifying these procedures and mandates, the bill could lead to more reliable and faster payment flows, ultimately benefiting children reliant on child support payments.

Summary

House Bill 222 (HB222) proposed amendments to Louisiana's existing laws regarding the enforcement of child support payments, specifically focusing on the garnishment of income. The bill aims to streamline the process of income assignment by ensuring that deducted amounts for child support are forwarded promptly to the relevant parties within a specified time frame. The legislation reflects an effort to enhance the efficiency of child support payment compliance and ensure timely deliveries to custodial parents or their representatives.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB222 appears to be supportive among legislators who favor increased efficiency in child support enforcement. Many see the bill as a necessary step to ensure that custodial parents receive the support they are entitled to without unnecessary delays. However, there are concerns among some members regarding the administrative burden placed upon employers who are responsible for implementing these garnishments accurately and in a timely manner.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB222 include the implications of increased workload for employers and the potential challenges in making timely payments, especially when multiple deductions are being processed simultaneously. Some legislators expressed worries that the bill does not sufficiently address the administrative difficulties that businesses might encounter under the new garnishment requirements. The balance between enforcing child support obligations and minimizing administrative burdens on employers remains a pivotal point of discussion.