Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB263

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Refer
4/12/10  
Report Pass
4/27/10  
Engrossed
5/10/10  
Refer
5/11/10  
Report Pass
6/8/10  
Enrolled
6/20/10  
Chaptered
7/2/10  

Caption

Provides relative to the transfer of child support actions

Impact

The changes introduced by HB 263 are expected to enhance the efficiency of child support enforcement. By clearly defining the proper parties who can enforce child support obligations, the bill aims to reduce confusion in cases where jurisdiction transfers between different courts. This amendment is particularly critical in cases involving complex family situations, ensuring that caretakers or individuals owed support can easily access the courts for rectifying support orders without unnecessary delays.

Summary

House Bill 263 seeks to amend Louisiana’s existing child support laws by clarifying the jurisdiction of juvenile courts and establishing procedures for the enforcement and modification of support obligations. One of the key features of the bill is to streamline the process of modifying support orders by allowing interested parties to petition the courts for adjustments in their payments. This ensures that modifications take effect retroactively to the date of the motion filing, allowing for immediate compliance and fairness in financial obligations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 263 appears to be positive, as it focuses on making the child support system more responsive to the needs of families. Advocates for the bill, including various child welfare organizations, highlight that the proposed adjustments would provide more support and protection for children whose financial wellbeing depends on these obligations. Additionally, the retroactive enforcement feature is applauded for addressing potential gaps in financial responsibility.

Contention

While there seems to be substantial support for the bill, it is crucial to consider potential points of contention that might arise during discussions. Critics could argue that the bill may lead to increased litigation as more parties attempt to modify support orders, potentially adding to the court's workload. Furthermore, concerns about ensuring that the modifications do not inadvertently disadvantage parents with limited financial resources may be raised, particularly regarding the ability to comply with retroactive payments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.