Louisiana House Bill HB305

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in "Shelton J. Rayford and Janice A. Dzerve v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al."

Impact

The passage of HB 305 reflects the state’s commitment to resolving liabilities and judgments awarded by the courts. By appropriating these funds, the bill ensures that the state meets its financial obligations resulting from legal actions. This action contributes to the efficiency of state governance by addressing and settling court rulings promptly. It underlines the administrative responsibility of the state to finance obligations arising from judicial decisions related to transportation and infrastructure matters.

Summary

House Bill 305 is a legislative measure that appropriates funds from the state of Louisiana's general fund for the fiscal year 2010-2011. Specifically, the bill allocates a sum of $70,000 to pay a consent judgment in favor of Janice A. Dzerve, stemming from a lawsuit titled 'Shelton J. Rayford and Janice A. Dzerve v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al.' This judicial decision is significant as it entails financial compensation due to a legal ruling against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD).

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears to be neutral and pragmatic. Lawmakers and stakeholders may recognize the necessity of appropriating funds to uphold judicial rulings and avoid further legal complications. Although specific sentiments from public discussion or legislative debate were not captured, the nature of the bill as a financial appropriation typically receives a less contentious reception compared to bills proposing more extensive policy changes or reforms.

Contention

There do not appear to be substantial points of contention surrounding HB 305, given its narrow focus on funding a specific legal obligation. However, issues related to funding from the state general fund may arise in broader discussions about budget priorities and fiscal responsibility. The primary concerns likely revolve around ensuring that such appropriations do not detract from other essential services and funding for different state programs.