Louisiana House Bill HB349

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in "N-Y Associates, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District"

Impact

The passage of HB 349 would directly affect the state's budgeting and fiscal responsibilities, ensuring that the judgment against the board is settled promptly. This appropriation underscores the state's commitment to resolving legal matters in a timely manner, which is crucial for maintaining trust and financial stability within government operations. Furthermore, it may influence future appropriations by setting a precedent for how the state handles similar legal judgments.

Summary

House Bill 349 pertains to the appropriation of funds for the payment of a legal judgment involving the N-Y Associates, Inc. and the Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Parish Levee District. Specifically, the bill allocates a total amount of $521,279, plus additional legal interest accrued since 1995 and court costs amounting to $18,492.57. This appropriation is drawn from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2010-2011 and is intended to resolve a long-standing legal dispute related to these two parties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 349 appears to be relatively straightforward, focusing on fiscal responsibility and legal obligation. There may be less polarization in public opinion compared to other legislative measures, as the bill is fundamentally about addressing a financial obligation rather than creating or modifying policy. However, there may still be concerns about the implications of such appropriations on the overall state budget and priority issues within the legislature.

Contention

While there may not be significant contention directly surrounding HB 349 itself, underlying tensions related to funding allocations and the state's financial commitments can be anticipated. Critics might question whether such appropriations divert resources from more pressing state needs or public services. Thus, the bill could ignite discussions about budgetary priorities and how the state addresses its legal liabilities in future legislative sessions.