Louisiana House Bill HB145

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Theresa Victor, et al v. Custom Bus Charters, Inc., et al" consolidated with "Leila Marie Tassin, et al v. Frank Bedell, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB145 is intended to ensure that the state fulfills its financial obligation resulting from this civil suit. By appropriating these funds, the state effectively addresses the court's ruling and is able to provide closure to the plaintiffs involved in the case. This bill thus highlights the state's responsibility in settling legal matters arising from incidents that involve its transportation departments and associated entities.

Summary

House Bill 145 appropriates funds from the state general fund of Louisiana for the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 to pay a court judgment related to the case 'Theresa Victor, et al v. Custom Bus Charters, Inc., et al' and consolidated with 'Leila Marie Tassin, et al v. Frank Bedell, et al'. The bill specifically allocates a total of $202,137.80, which includes the principal amount for the judgment, additional expenses for funeral costs, as well as legal costs incurred during the proceedings.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB145 appears to be supportive within legislative discussions, as it represents a necessary measure to comply with court orders. There seems to be a recognition of the need for the state to honor its commitments and address the financial impacts of lawsuits that stem from its operational responsibilities. However, as with any financial appropriation, there may be concern regarding the use of state funds and the implications on the state budget.

Contention

While there does not seem to be significant contention regarding the content of HB145 itself, discussions around similar appropriations often raise broader concerns about state funding priorities and the potential for such judgments to influence future budgeting decisions. The critical points of interest may revolve around how this bill fits into the larger context of state fiscal management and the potential for similar approved judgments requiring further appropriations in the future.