Louisiana House Bill HB36

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the matter of "Gloria Dechara v. State of La., et al" consolidated with "Leila Marie Tassin, et al v. Frank Bedell, et al"

Impact

Upon enactment, HB36 would enable the state to fulfil its legal commitments by settling the awarded judgment, effectively alleviating ongoing legal uncertainties for the DOTD. The provision of funds not only mitigates the state's financial liability but also exemplifies a policy commitment to honor judicial decisions. The bill aims to ensure procedural compliance within the state's financial administration, thereby potentially influencing perceptions of accountability and governance in handling legal matters.

Summary

House Bill 36, proposed by Representative Ligi, addresses the appropriation of funds for the payment of a legal judgment against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). This legislation seeks to allocate a total of $123,515.50, plus legal interest and court costs, aimed at resolving the financial obligations stemming from the consolidated lawsuits 'Gloria Dechara v. State of Louisiana, et al.' and 'Leila Marie Tassin, et al. v. Frank Bedell, et al.' The appropriated funds are sourced from the general fund of the state for the Fiscal Year 2011-2012, indicating a focused move towards addressing outstanding financial liabilities within the government framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB36 appeared to be largely pragmatic, with legislators emphasizing the necessity of settling legal judgments to uphold the state's dignity and obligations. The discussion was primarily structured around the legal aspects of governmental responsibilities rather than partisan conflicts. This sentiment indicates a recognition of the importance of resolving legal challenges faced by state entities and highlights a generally supportive view of ensuring fair resolutions in judicial matters.

Contention

While the discussion around HB36 did not reveal significant points of contention, it underscores the broader implications of state appropriations in fulfilling legal responsibilities. The bill's passage reflects a consensus around the necessity of judiciously allocating state resources to satisfy court judgments and ensure compliance with the rule of law. Stakeholders in the transportation sector may view legislative action on this bill as crucial in maintaining operational integrity amidst legal challenges.