Requires a levee report to indicate elevation based on NAVD of 1988
The amendment to R.S. 38:301.1(A) means that all levee districts and relevant parish authorities must now adopt a standardized method of report evidenced by NAVD 1988. This is expected to improve data consistency across different jurisdictions, thereby facilitating better decision-making regarding flood management and disaster preparedness. Moreover, the reports must also identify inconsistencies in levee elevations, which would initiate plans for corrective measures where needed, ultimately aiming to bolster community safety against flooding.
House Bill 485 requires that levee elevation reports submitted by levee districts and parishes located in coastal areas indicate the elevation based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 1988). The bill mandates that these reports are generated every three years and focus on tidal levees. The significance of this requirement is rooted in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of elevation data, which is critical for flood management and coastal protection efforts in the state.
The reception of this bill appears to be generally positive, particularly among stakeholders involved in coastal management and disaster preparedness. Supporters argue that utilizing NAVD 1988 aligns with federal standards, which enhances communication and collaboration with federal agencies focused on flood risk and coastal resilience. However, there may be some concerns from local authorities regarding the feasibility of implementing the stricter reporting requirements, as this could demand additional resources and changes in operational practices.
Notable points of contention might arise around the financial implications for local governments tasked with conducting the mandatory surveys every three years. Some critics may express concerns about the potential burden on local budgets, especially in areas facing economic challenges. Additionally, the specificity of the elevation reports could lead to disagreements over how inconsistencies are determined and corrected, highlighting the need for clear guidelines and support from state agencies to assist local entities in fulfilling these requirements.