Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB540

Introduced
3/16/10  
Refer
4/13/10  
Report Pass
4/27/10  
Engrossed
5/10/10  
Refer
5/11/10  
Report Pass
6/10/10  
Enrolled
6/18/10  
Chaptered
7/2/10  

Caption

Provides relative to the appropriation procedures of the South Lafourche Levee District

Impact

Significantly, HB 540 establishes a legal framework for property owners to contest appropriations. Owners now have a specified timeframe of sixty days to file challenges to the appropriation resolution if they believe it infringes on their property rights. This clause aims to balance the authority of the South Lafourche Levee District with the rights of individual property owners. Additionally, it sets forth requirements for the district to publish appropriation resolutions, thereby increasing accountability in their actions.

Summary

House Bill 540 aims to amend procedures related to property appropriation by the South Lafourche Levee District. Specifically, it seeks to streamline notification processes to property owners whose land may be appropriated for levee or levee drainage purposes. The bill introduces regulations requiring that notice be sent via certified mail to property owners, ensuring that they are adequately informed about any appropriation actions. This provision is intended to enhance transparency and trust between the district and landowners.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 540 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with support garnered from those who appreciate the enhanced rights and notification processes for property owners. Supporters believe that ensuring property owners are duly informed and have the right to challenge appropriations protects against potential overreach by governmental entities. Conversely, there may also be concerns from some stakeholders about any potential delays or complications that could arise from allowing property owners to contest appropriations, possibly impacting the efficient execution of critical levee projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's stipulation that failure to contest the appropriation within the sixty-day window results in a forfeiture of rights. Some may argue that this imposes a rushed timeline on property owners, potentially disadvantaging those who may not be aware of the district’s actions in time to respond. Additionally, the prohibition on class action lawsuits regarding these appropriations may discourage collective challenges from affected property owners, raising concerns about their ability to mount a robust defense against potentially unjust appropriations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB20

Surplus state property: Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District.

CA SB58

Wildlife management areas: payment of taxes and assessments.

CA SB958

Surplus state property: County of Napa.

CA SB569

Department of Transportation: homeless encampments.

MI HB4162

Appropriations: school aid; appropriations for K-12 school aid; provide for. Amends secs. 11 & 17b of 1979 PA 94 (MCL 388.1611 & 388.1617b).

CA AB903

Los Medanos Community Healthcare District.

CA AB68

School facilities: schoolsite acquisition.

CA SCA8

Wildfires: funding.