Louisiana House Bill HB6

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/28/10
• Refer: 4/29/10

Caption

Provides that sentences for the crime of aggravated second degree battery shall not be suspended (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The introduction of HB 6 reflects a shift towards tougher penalties for violent crimes in Louisiana. By preventing sentence suspension, the law aims to deter individuals from committing aggravated second degree battery, thereby potentially reducing incidents of such offenses. The revised law creates a clearer legal framework for judges, ensuring a uniform application of penalties for crimes classified as violent, which could also streamline the judicial process relating to sentencing in these cases.

Summary

House Bill 6 aims to provide stricter sentencing for individuals convicted of aggravated second degree battery by ensuring that such sentences cannot be suspended. This amendment to the existing Code of Criminal Procedure modifies Article 893(A) to include aggravated second degree battery among those crimes for which sentence suspension is not permitted. The intention behind this legislation is to address concerns surrounding violent crimes and to enhance public safety by imposing more severe penalties on offenders. By eliminating the option for suspended sentences, the bill seeks to create a definitive consequence for these actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6 tends to be generally supportive among law enforcement and public safety advocates, who view it as a necessary step to combat violent crime. Proponents argue that stronger penalties will enhance the safety of communities and ensure that individuals who commit such serious offenses face appropriate repercussions. However, there may be some contention among legal scholars and criminal justice reform advocates, who could express concerns about the potential adverse effects of mandatory sentencing and its implications for judicial discretion.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 6 may arise from discussions regarding the efficacy of mandatory sentencing laws. Critics may argue that such measures can lead to over-incarceration and do not adequately consider the nuances of individual cases, such as circumstances surrounding the offense or the offender's background. Additionally, the bill's passage could provoke deliberations around the broader landscape of criminal justice reform, including the need for rehabilitation programs or alternatives to incarceration for non-violent offenders.