Louisiana House Bill HB729

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/12/10
• Engrossed: 5/19/10
• Refer: 5/20/10
• Report Pass: 6/7/10
• Enrolled: 6/14/10
• Chaptered: 6/24/10
• Passed: 6/24/10

Caption

Provides with respect to the sale of surplus property by school boards (EN INCREASE LF RV See Note)

Impact

The changes proposed by HB 729 could lead to more efficient sales of surplus property, particularly by providing a clearer structure for school boards on how to approach failed sales. By allowing for a reduced minimum bid on subsequent attempts, the bill intends to ensure that valuable school property does not remain unsold due to an overly restrictive initial bid requirement. This may enhance the financial position of school boards by enabling them to recover funds from surplus property that would otherwise be difficult to sell under stricter regulations.

Summary

House Bill 729 aims to redefine the processes related to the sale of surplus property by school boards in Louisiana. The bill amends existing law to specify the minimum bid that can be accepted when a school board attempts to sell such property. It establishes a tiered approach for determining the minimum bid based on previous attempts to sell the property, allowing flexibility in the bidding process that can encourage sales that may have previously stalled due to high initial minimum requirements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 729 appears to be generally supportive among legislators who recognize the need for school boards to maximize their resources through effective property management. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential undervaluation of properties if minimum bids are reduced too significantly, with some stakeholders advocating for safeguards to ensure that properties are not sold for less than their fair market value.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the balance between facilitating sales and ensuring that properties are sold at reasonable values. Critics might argue that lowering the minimum bid could lead to sell-offs that do not secure adequate returns for school boards and potentially undervalue public assets, thereby affecting future funding and resources. The discussions around this bill highlight the ongoing challenge of property management within educational institutions and the importance of finding efficient solutions that also protect taxpayer interests.