Louisiana House Bill HB793

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Provides relative to qualifications, compensation, and benefits of, restrictions on, and disclosure requirements for the members (OR DECREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The most significant changes proposed by HB 793 include the shift from salaried positions to a per diem compensation structure—each member will receive a $100 payment for attending meetings, in addition to mileage reimbursement. The bill also removes previous requirements for commission members to work full-time, thus allowing them to engage in other employment as long as they disclose such engagements to the commission. Furthermore, it clarifies that commission members will not be eligible for benefits or participation in public retirement systems, thereby altering the financial landscape for potential appointees.

Summary

House Bill 793 seeks to amend the regulations regarding the Louisiana Tax Commission, specifically focusing on the qualifications, compensation, and duties of its members. This legislation establishes that members of the commission must have significant experience and education related to property tax assessment or administration. Each appointed member is required to have at least five years of relevant experience or hold a baccalaureate degree in related fields, ensuring that the commission is staffed by qualified individuals.

Sentiment

Responses to HB 793 indicate a mixture of support and concern. Proponents of the bill contend that these changes will encourage a broader range of qualified individuals to serve on the commission, as it lowers the barrier of financial compensation. They also argue that the new structure may lead to more effective oversight of property tax assessments, given the emphasis on expertise. Conversely, critics express concern that the removal of a salary may deter highly qualified individuals who are unable to afford to serve in a volunteer capacity, potentially leading to a less competent commission.

Contention

The bill has sparked notable contention primarily around the implications of these changes for public service and accountability. Critics argue that reducing the financial incentives for serving on the commission could reduce the quality and diversity of candidates, while proponents are focused on the merits of maintaining a position that requires expert knowledge without the burdensome salary regulations. Additionally, some stakeholders raise questions about the feasibility of members managing external employment alongside their duties, which could lead to conflicts of interest if not adequately monitored.