Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB850

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/27/10  
Engrossed
5/10/10  
Refer
5/11/10  
Report Pass
6/7/10  
Enrolled
6/17/10  
Chaptered
6/29/10  

Caption

Authorizes the collection of refundable deposits from tax sale participants prior to the commencement of the tax sale (REF NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 850 is expected to streamline the tax sale process in Louisiana. By introducing a refundable deposit, the bill seeks to prioritize serious bidders and may alleviate some concerns related to the potential for non-serious participants disrupting the sales. This provision may enhance the overall effectiveness of collecting delinquent taxes by ensuring that the tax sale process attracts genuine buyers, thereby potentially increasing the revenue flowing back to the state from tax sales, impacting local government finances positively.

Summary

House Bill 850 introduces changes regarding the tax sale process in Louisiana by granting tax collectors the authority to require refundable deposits from participants prior to tax sales. This deposit can be up to one thousand dollars, with the intent of ensuring serious participation in such sales. If a participant wins the bid, their deposit will be applied toward the sale price, while non-winning bidders will have their deposits returned within fourteen days. This amendment aims to make the tax sale process more efficient and reduce the likelihood of frivolous bidding.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 850 appears to be largely positive among lawmakers, as it is viewed as a practical approach to improving the tax sale process. There may, however, be some concerns about the implications of requiring a deposit, particularly regarding accessibility for smaller bidders who might be deterred by upfront costs. Discussions hint that while the intention of the bill is to foster a more serious bidding environment, stakeholders are still weighing the fairness of the deposit requirement for all potential participants.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the required refundable deposit. While proponents argue that the deposit will enforce seriousness among bidders, critics may argue that it could disadvantage individuals or small entities who may not be able to afford the upfront cost. This aspect has raised questions about potential barriers to participation in tax sales, especially for those from lower economic backgrounds who may already face financial constraints.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.