Louisiana House Bill HB859

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Prohibits certain traffic cameras on highways that receive public funding

Impact

If enacted, HB 859 would specifically affect the operations of local traffic enforcement within jurisdictions that rely on federal or state funding for their roadways. Municipalities currently using automated traffic cameras would be required to discontinue their use by January 1, 2011. This could lead to a significant reduction in automated traffic enforcement capabilities in various localities, potentially impacting traffic safety, revenue from fines, and enforcement of traffic laws.

Summary

House Bill 859 aims to prohibit the installation and use of automated traffic enforcement systems on any local streets, roads, or state highways funded by federal or state dollars. The bill defines an 'automated traffic enforcement system' as a camera or optical device designed to enforce traffic laws by capturing images of vehicles that violate traffic control signals or signs. By placing restrictions on the use of such systems, the bill intends to limit local municipalities and parishes from utilizing these technologies in areas receiving public funding.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 859 appears to be mixed, reflecting both support and opposition from various stakeholders. Proponents might argue that the bill protects citizens from over-regulation and the perceived misuse of automated systems for revenue generation rather than safety. Conversely, opponents of the bill are likely to believe that the removal of automated enforcement systems could lead to increased traffic violations and unsafe driving conditions, arguing that these systems serve a crucial role in enhancing public safety.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the potential trade-off between improving road safety and reducing local government revenue from traffic fines. Critics may contend that automated systems are effective tools for deterring traffic violations, while supporters of the bill might prioritize limiting government overreach and addressing concerns regarding privacy. As local authorities may experience challenges in enforcing traffic laws without these systems, the debate centers around balancing safety with local governance and public accountability.