Louisiana House Bill HB886

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Provides for litter abatement and enforcement and education programs (OR +$700,000 SD RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 886 is expected to streamline the funding and implementation of environmental education and litter abatement efforts in Louisiana. By consolidating existing funds into a dedicated account, the bill enhances the focus on combating litter through organized enforcement activities and community engagement. Local governments and organizations could benefit from this centralized funding, leading to better public awareness and education programs regarding littering, which could positively affect public spaces and waterways.

Summary

House Bill 886 aims to address litter abatement and enforcement while promoting education around environmental stewardship in Louisiana. The bill establishes a 'litter abatement and education account' within the existing Conservation Fund, which will be funded through fees associated with driver's licenses and special environmental education license plates. The funds collected will be used exclusively for initiatives related to litter enforcement, public service announcements, and grants for nonprofits involved in environmental education programs.

Sentiment

Opinions on HB 886 were generally supportive among environmental advocates and stakeholders who see it as a crucial step in addressing litter issues across the state. Proponents argue that the bill will provide necessary resources to combat litter effectively. However, some concerns were raised about the reliance on fees from driver's licenses as a funding mechanism, questioning whether this approach may impact citizens disproportionately. Nonetheless, the emphasis on education and public engagement generally contributes to a positive reception of the bill.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB 886 is the sustainability and adequacy of funding. Critics have questioned whether the generated fees will be sufficient to cover ongoing costs associated with litter enforcement and education programs. Additionally, some stakeholders have expressed concern about the administrative oversight of the newly established account and its effectiveness in reducing litter. The focus on environmental education represents an acknowledgment of the need for long-term behavioral change in littering practices, and how these programs will be executed post-enactment remains to be seen.