Louisiana House Bill HB996

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/26/10

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Abolishes the Board of Regents, LSU board, Southern University board, and UL board and creates the La. University System Board of Trustees (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Impact

If enacted, HB 996 will fundamentally alter the operational framework of Louisiana's higher education system. The proposed changes will centralize management under the Louisiana University System Board of Trustees, which is devised to carry out budgetary responsibilities and institutional planning that was formerly handled by multiple separate boards. Transitioning to a singular board is expected to create a more cohesive governance structure, potentially improving decision-making efficiency in the realm of higher education across the state.

Summary

House Bill 996 proposes a significant reorganization of the governance structure for higher education in Louisiana. It aims to abolish the existing Board of Regents and management boards for public colleges and universities, replacing them with a newly established Louisiana University System Board of Trustees. This newly proposed board will be responsible for planning, coordinating, and managing public postsecondary educational institutions, specifically those authorized to offer baccalaureate degrees or higher. The bill is positioned as a way to streamline and enhance the oversight of higher education within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 996 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that consolidating the governance of higher education will lend clarity and authority to decision-making processes, potentially paving the way for more strategic funding and resource allocation. Conversely, opponents of the measure fear that dismantling the existing boards may compromise localized oversight tailored to the specific needs of individual institutions and their communities. This reflects a broader debate over centralized versus decentralized governance structures in the area of education.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the potential loss of representation and oversight that local boards provided. Critics of the bill argue that it may lead to a disconnect between the governance of public universities and the communities they serve, while advocates emphasize the need for a streamlined structure to address funding and operational challenges. The passing of HB 996 would require the electorate’s approval, illustrating the need for broader public engagement in discussions about the future of higher education governance.